Just saw Lost Boys 2. Someone please explain the ending to me.

The Pink Panthe · 07-19-2008, 05:12 PM

I knew Corey Haim was going to be in it although I expected a bit more than that.
Firstly, why was Frog there? How did he know Sam (Haim) was there. Why have they not explained Sams story running up to that point?

I just didn't get it. The film wasn't a patch on the original, in fact, it was a turd. However, the ending managed to really stump me. Anyone?

fullcontact · 07-19-2008, 05:33 PM

nice double thread post fail

**lawngnome8273** · 07-19-2008, 05:46 PM

I'm having a hard time deciding which thread to post in. You gave enough choices.

Either way, I thought the first one itself was a giant turd sandwich.

WUchi · 07-19-2008, 05:52 PM

sequels suck ...except for weekend at bernie's 2

**MonkeySkull** · 07-19-2008, 05:55 PM

Lemme sechs your face holes.

The Pink Panthe · 07-19-2008, 06:01 PM

Such wit. You guys are great for pointing out that I double posted which was obviously not intentional.
Well done yall.

To the guy who said the first one was a turd sandwich--- I guess you needed to be there (the 80's).

Quote:

Originally Posted by WUchi

sequels suck ...except for weekend at bernie's 2

WRONG!!!!!

WUchi · 07-19-2008, 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Pink Panthe

WRONG!!!!!

i'm not saying its better than the OG . but it was equally as oscar worthy

**Elliie** · 07-19-2008, 06:12 PM

hes pissed...

Wolfwood · 07-19-2008, 06:25 PM

they imply it thorugh out the movie. Remeber they post I lost someone close to me to vampires to on several occasions.

The ending is suppose to be contious to the rest of the film. THey don't explain becasue it is isolated and not realted to the rest of the plot.

The Pink Panthe · 07-19-2008, 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wolfwood

they imply it thorugh out the movie. Remeber they post I lost someone close to me to vampires to on several occasions.

The ending is suppose to be contious to the rest of the film. They don't explain becasue it is isolated and not realted to the rest of the plot.

I assumed he was talking about the part of his brother who was in the first film with him.
And while I agree it wasn't related to the rest of the plot, it makes me wonder why they put it in there. It wasn't needed nor was it relevant. And seeing ast they did include that part, I think they should have explained it. The damn film makers didn't even tell us what happened next, they just cut to the credits.