Quote:
Originally Posted by SpAzNeT
Those are the 2 I have been looking at. Leaning with the crossbreed since it has the lifetime warranty. As far as concealability is concerned, are the crossbreed and MTAC/CTAC holsters about the same?? And what are you carrying in yours?
Barut: After some googling just wanted to ask your opinion. How comfortable and how concealable is it? I have a Don Hume with the clip but it just isn't comfortable and it doesn't keep my gun close to my body.
My brother has the milt sparks VM2 and it is nice, but noway am I waiting 6 months to get that. Thanks for the suggestions, I hate being such a cheap SOB I have to research something over and over again before I go and get it.
|
I can only compare the crossbreed supertuck and the comp-tac spartan. I went with the spartan over the mtac cause I didnt like the double leather fold on the mtac (because it looks bulkier) and it was a bit more.
The spartan conceals almost exactly like the crossbreed supertuck. There is no edge in this department for either holster and there really is no difference as far as printing goes. I like the belt clips on the spartan better. The supertuck I had I had to cut out a patch of leather cause the pistol was harder to draw without the notch I cut out. Now, crossbreed supertucks come with the option of them to cut the notch for you. They call it the gunfighter package or something and then charge you 10 more bucks or whatever.
The spartan comes ready to rock. It doesnt have the life warranty (only 2 years) but I think I like it a tad bit better. I feel its a better design but they are close. I give the spartan 9/10 and supertuck 8/10. I dont like IWB holsters, would prefer to carry OWB but then you trade comfort for concealability.
You can try either with a return free if you dont like it. I would chose the spartan again but you really couldnt miss with either.