Save
Random Shot: 
 

Welcome to the Sherdog Mixed Martial Arts Forums forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

 

Go Back  Sherdog Mixed Martial Arts Forums > General Discussion > The War Room > Why is being for the war when it started and being against it now a 'flip-flop'?

Reply
 
Sherdog Forums
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-13-2008, 05:30 PM   #21 (permalink)
In it for the laughs
 
dylanransom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Snuggling in Carlin's Coffin
Posts: 4,754
Status: dylanransom is offline
Send a message via ICQ to dylanransom Send a message via AIM to dylanransom Send a message via Yahoo to dylanransom
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ham_Roll View Post
You used to be cool

I guess I flip-flopped...
__________________
Let's keep an eye on who benefits from this economic crisis. Remember that wealth doesn't disappear, as some of you are so fond of saying.
dylanransom is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote

Old 07-13-2008, 05:33 PM   #22 (permalink)
JSN

Silver Belt
 
JSN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: America (Fuck Yeah!)
Posts: 12,668
Status: JSN is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by stylesbjj View Post
Obviously, a lot of new evidence and circumstances have come out since the start of the war.
don't you know anything? it's much better to blindly stick with a wrong idea than it is to *gasp!* change! flip-flopping is akin to limpwristedness or a speech impediment.
__________________
"The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes." - Benjamin Disraeli
JSN is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2008, 05:54 PM   #23 (permalink)

Blue Belt
 
farrellesque's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 753
Status: farrellesque is offline
Because when you change your opinion based on new evidence it emboldens the enemy. Like when a ship captain realizes the light he was manouvering towards is in fact not a star, but a lighthouse. Stay the course or the terrorists win.
__________________
"We are going to win the war. Suck it."

-MMAfan007
farrellesque is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2008, 06:00 PM   #24 (permalink)

Black Belt
 
BayAreaGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Dump
Posts: 7,136
Status: BayAreaGuy is offline
When a republican changes his stance on something he's doing so because of new facts.


When it's a democrat, he's a flip flop.






When a republican keeps the same position even though facts change, it's "he has core convictions and doesn't lead by poles".


With a democrat, it's "he's out of touch with reality".
BayAreaGuy is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2008, 06:05 PM   #25 (permalink)

Brown Belt
 
Workers United's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,522
Status: Workers United is offline
If you find out new information, and your opinion changes to a more correct view, then that's a sign of intelligence.

On the issue of war, not only was I calling bullshit on the WMD's but I was deconstructing the real reasons behind the war BEFORE THE WAR EVEN STARTED.

Further, I predicted the war was going to happen by reading the Hart Rudman comission report, way back when, and people were saying I was an idiot and that we'd already fought that war and won it.

I was at the first demonstrations that predated the beginning of the war.

Yes, but of course, Marxism is outdated and its explanatory power isn't real. Which is why I'm like Nostradamas compared to most people on here on almost every single issue.
__________________
You can kill the revolutionary but you can't kill the revolution
Workers United is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2008, 07:27 PM   #26 (permalink)

Orange Belt
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Long Island
Posts: 315
Status: charlydevo is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by Workers United View Post
If you find out new information, and your opinion changes to a more correct view, then that's a sign of intelligence.

On the issue of war, not only was I calling bullshit on the WMD's but I was deconstructing the real reasons behind the war BEFORE THE WAR EVEN STARTED.

Further, I predicted the war was going to happen by reading the Hart Rudman comission report, way back when, and people were saying I was an idiot and that we'd already fought that war and won it.

I was at the first demonstrations that predated the beginning of the war.

Yes, but of course, Marxism is outdated and its explanatory power isn't real. Which is why I'm like Nostradamas compared to most people on here on almost every single issue.

You must be a genius. Why is it that nobody knows your name yet?
__________________
Chuck
charlydevo is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2008, 08:43 PM   #27 (permalink)

Purple Belt
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,392
Status: Happnin' Mojo is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by charlydevo View Post
It looks to me like Chardog pointed out some great quotes. Come to think of it, I've never heard a Democrat come out and say "We fucked up". All I hear from them is "Bush fucked up". Apparently, once the war become unpopular, the Democrats who were supporters of the war had no inkling to accept any blame whatsoever. Don't forget that their decisions and opinions were based on the same evidence that the President had. Now they want to call the President a liar? Where is their virtue?

Some of those quotes were from the time in which the Clinton administration had done strategic airstrikes on facilities in Iraq which Republicans were against at the time, they often deemed it a distraction from his extra marital activities ala Wag the Dog.

Secondly politicians rarely ever admit mistakes, the only one that I can recall is Adlai Stevenson and William Jennings Bryan. Oh yeah and George Wallace.

As for the politicians that voted fr the war they deserve every bit of criticism they get but even though they're douches that doesn't excuse the administration...
__________________
There is nothing worse than aggressive stupidity.

Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749 - 1832)
Happnin' Mojo is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2008, 08:50 PM   #28 (permalink)

Brown Belt
 
DaRuckus337's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,072
Status: DaRuckus337 is offline
Sometimes politicians flip-flop. Sometimes - like the rest of us - they learn from experience and change their tune as a result. Sometimes, upon hearing outcry from their constituency, they have a change of heart because they realize the direction they were moving in was directly opposed to the direction the people who hired him want. I think we all need to be aware of the fact that merely changing your mind does not necessarily mean you have 'flip-flopped', and can in fact be a sign of a reasonable, wise, and open-minded individual with the ability to learn from experience and listen to others. In my opinion, it's only a 'real' flip-flop when the media convinces you to change your mind, or when you say different things on different days to appeal to different crowds and to take advantage of the newest headline.
DaRuckus337 is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2008, 09:01 PM   #29 (permalink)

Orange Belt
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Long Island
Posts: 315
Status: charlydevo is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by Happnin' Mojo View Post
Some of those quotes were from the time in which the Clinton administration had done strategic airstrikes on facilities in Iraq which Republicans were against at the time, they often deemed it a distraction from his extra marital activities ala Wag the Dog.

Secondly politicians rarely ever admit mistakes, the only one that I can recall is Adlai Stevenson and William Jennings Bryan. Oh yeah and George Wallace.

As for the politicians that voted fr the war they deserve every bit of criticism they get but even though they're douches that doesn't excuse the administration...
I don't want an excuse for the administration. I want somebody to muster up the fortitude to acknowledge that they screwed up just as badly. They all worked off of the same information. They all came to the same conclusions. I'd like to hear somebody like Nancy Pelosi admit that she agreed with Bush's decision to invade Iraq. I'm tired of hearing people like her saying that Bush lied to her, and that she wouldn't have invaded Iraq.

By the way, I'm all for leaving Iraq as soon as possible. I think that the war on terrorism could be won more expeditiously through other means. But then again, I'm not the President, and I'm not privileged to the same information as he is.
__________________
Chuck
charlydevo is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2008, 11:14 PM   #30 (permalink)

Purple Belt
 
megaseth7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,431
Status: megaseth7 is offline
Because we should have gotten it right the first time, it was that important.
__________________
Cut Taxes, End Regulation and Print Money!
megaseth7 is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote

Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin Version {1. Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2008 Sherdog.com | Privacy Policy | Click here to advertise on Sherdog