What a real controlled demolition looks like.

icantstandit · 08-24-2006, 03:30 PM

I haven't started an Anti-9/11 CT thread in a while, but I couldn't let this one slide. Stupidity is like a disease that spreads via disreputable Internet sites, and it needs to be stopped. I can see that some people here have already been infected.

The "controlled demolition of WTC 1 and 2":

Unfreaking believable that you guys still hold onto this... WTC was obviously NOT demolitioned if you look at any demolition of any building of a comparable size (which there hasn't been in reality, btw...).

Where the hell do you people get this notion that it "looks like a controlled demolition"? Have you never seen a tall building demolished before?

If you actually think that the destruction of these three buildings (WTC1,2 and this building) look alike, then you are either lying to yourself, or just in denial. They look nothing alike, and there is much more control to the ACTUAL demo job than the WTC. Quite frankly, this is the weakest most non-sensical analysis to date by you CTers.

Check out this video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EBw9v0xs_9k

Notice:

What REAL squibs look like (dozens, clearly visable, timed perfectly)
What a REAL DEMOLITION looks like (nothing at all like WTC)
Note how it falls into its foot NEATLY (unlike the WTC)
Note how it DIDN'T fall to the sides, all over neighboring buildings
Note how the Squibs do NOT HAPPEN at the same, and they occur in sucession
Note how main explosions happen AT THE BOTTOM of the building, after a long series of weakening squibs that CLEARLY GO UP AND DOWN THE BUILDING
Note the "pulverized concrete" that is shot into the air
Note that even after the squibs, it takes a few seconds to fall (the alleged "squibs" from the WTC happen AFTER the WTC started to fall, not before it)
Note that it does NOT fall symetrically (CTers claim that all demo jobs fall symetrically)
Note how it took weeks of planning to set those up, and also note how much bigger the 3 BUILDINGS from the WTC were (ya think it might have taken a bit longer, with more demo experts required? Ya think? No seriously, do you think at all, generally speaking?)

icantstandit · 08-24-2006, 03:44 PM

But apparently, CD16 thinks that when a building falls "on its own"(which, I am not sure how that happens anyway...) that there shouldn't be any dust.

"Prove to me that there should be dust when a building collapses (but not by a demo job)!"

Have we just stepped into the "Twit Zone"?

norcal313 · 08-24-2006, 03:47 PM

Did you just make the first reply to your own thread? Troll!

(I agree with you, for once)

icantstandit · 08-24-2006, 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by norcal313

Did you just make the first reply to your own thread? Troll!

(I agree with you, for once)

Someone had to get it going!

Yeah, I happen to fall into the category of "liberal asshole who is not stupid enough to believe the 9/11 CT"... I make good points. I come off as an asshole. People often dislike me but agree with my points. Go figure...

I may be an asshole, but I know I am not gullible enough to believe "experts" found on random crap CT sites...

HomeCheese · 08-24-2006, 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by icantstandit

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EBw9v0xs_9k

Sarcastically: Oh yah, that hardly looked at all like the collapse of the WTC’s.

Nietzsche13 · 08-24-2006, 04:44 PM

"When anti-CTs do things like CTs"

I'm gunna go cut my grass now...cause this footage settles everything.

Poly should come in and post his, "This is gunna break this case wide open..."

**Zankou** · 08-24-2006, 05:22 PM

Why interject evidence into a debate that has nothing to do with evidence?

Interesting nonetheless to see how they demo such a big building.

Free like a dog · 08-24-2006, 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zankou

Why interject evidence into a debate that has nothing to do with evidence?

Good point.

icantstandit · 08-24-2006, 05:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HomeCheese

Sarcastically: Oh yah, that hardly looked at all like the collapse of the WTC’s.

OMG... NOT YOU TOO HOME CHEESE!!!

You CTers are the like pod people. All of the sudden, formerly rational and intelligent people become zombies controlled by some other force... THE CT REALM....

If you actually think that it "looks just like the WTC collapse" then you are truly, truly keeping your eyes shut.

It looks NOTHING AT ALL LIKE the collapses of WTC1 and 2. NOTHING... AT... ALL.... (well, except for the whole building falling thing of course...)

1) Where is the building falling out and to the sides of the building, thereby damaging all surrounding structures? Didn't happen...

2) Why are there CLEAR and SUCCESIVE squibs in the actual demolition, but nothing of the sort for the WTC? Because there were no squibs...

3) Why does the controlled demolition fall neatly into the footrpint? Because, again, WTC was not a controlled demolition, and that is why it fell everywhere... instead of neatly coming down.

4) Why does the collapse of the WTC start at the top, while the controlled demo starts first with CLEAR explosions, followed by a collapse at the bottom? Because, again, it was not a freakin' controlled demolition...

5) Why do you CTers say "WTC7 was definitely a controlled demo job because it fell neatly" but then you apply different standards to WTC1 and 2, saying "it was a demo job too"? Again, because contradictions and illogical theories are the norm for the CTer...

6) WHy will you gloss over these extreme contradictions? Tis the CTers way....

But in the end, it doesn't matter who many times I upend your stupid theories about 9/11. You'll believe your Bibles (the CT websites,the 3-4 "experts" in your camp) forever, and I can never convince you otherwise. You are religious zealots who have no clue you are religious zealots. In fact, you believe your reality IS reality, which is sad considering how illogical and false your world is.

.......

icantstandit · 08-24-2006, 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zankou

Why interject evidence into a debate that has nothing to do with evidence?

Interesting nonetheless to see how they demo such a big building.

Prove that Hitler is not alive and well, and living in Argentina!

If you can't prove it false, that means I am right...

(Seriously, I don't know why I even try, because even if I did, there would be the next illogical tool who comes in to take their place with new "proof" that WTC7 was demolished because he saw it on YouTube... 2nd verse, same as the 1st... *smacks head on keyboard*)

SIGH....