 |
|
|
|
|
 |
05-14-2008, 09:00 AM
|
#31 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Status:
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HeadBanger
It's not going to happen in our lifetime. It currently takes 7 years to get an unmannned vessel from earth to Mercury. I don't really think that you guys are understanding how far we would have to travel. Plus we would have to be able to navigate through an asteroid belt.
|
I know what your saying, but if the american people were enthusiastically behind it like in the 60s, we could it. but no one cares anymore and most americans believe its a waste of goverment money because "nothings out there". I want to know what happend to mankinds passion for exploration and the unknown. I remember when I was in second grade the teacher was giving a lesson on the 9 planets in the solar system and I asked her if thats all there is and she said yes, and I said how do you know and she said its a fact and I asked her if it was even possible that planets exist on other stars and her answer was an equivical NO. that pissed me off and thank god I was exonerated with the discovery of exoplanets in the 90s. my point is where is that determination ? where is the passion ? it seems humans only care about materialism and starting wars with each other.
Ex astris, scientia - from the stars, knowledge
|
| |
|
05-14-2008, 09:01 AM
|
#32 (permalink)
|
Blue Belt
Status:
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HeadBanger
It's not going to happen in our lifetime. It currently takes 7 years to get an unmannned vessel from Earth to Mercury. I don't really think that you guys are understanding how far we would have to travel. Plus we would have to be able to navigate through an asteroid belt.
|
we will be traveling faster than light
|
| |
|
05-14-2008, 09:02 AM
|
#33 (permalink)
|
|
Bad Guy
| Location:
http://headbanger.aforumfree.com/ |
Status:
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bubba
we will be traveling faster than light
|
That's impossible, the speed of light is the speed limit of the Universe.
__________________
"Headbanger is a legit crack addict and has shit for brains. His ability to weave together slices of reality with totally non-sequitor, asinine points of bullshit is simply astonishing." -Octavian
|
| |
|
05-14-2008, 09:02 AM
|
#34 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Status:
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bubba
we will be traveling faster than light
|
exactly...we just need to find an energy source and work out some of the implied paradoxes
|
| |
|
05-14-2008, 09:03 AM
|
#35 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Status:
|
|
Astronomers predict faster- than- light travel based
[From "The Sunday Times" (UK) 13th August 1995]
ASTRONOMERS PREDICT FASTER THAN LIGHT SPACE TRAVEL
It is boldly going where no reputable scientific body has gone before.
Contradicting Einstein, the normally conservative Royal Astronomical
Society is about to publish a report predicting that mankind will be able
to travel faster than the speed of light.
The breakthrough means that Star Trek fantasies of interstellar
civilisations and voyages powered by warp drive are now no longer the
exclusive domain of science fiction writers.
The report was written by Ian Crawford, an astronomer at University
College London, who believes not only that man will one day see stars at
close quarters, but that we had better start preparing ourselves for the
consequences, including contact with aliens.
His paper, Some Thoughts On The Implications Of Faster-Than-Light Travel,
has been validated by independent referees in the scientific community
and will be published next month. Its publication coincides with the
formation by British and American scientists of the Interstellar
Propulsion Society (IPS) which is dedicated to finding a means of taking
astronauts to the stars.
Crawford argues that modern physics may allow two possible ways around
Einstein's theory, which says that because bodies have infinite mass at
the speed of light, no amount of energy can make them go faster.
The first is to pass through "wormholes", rifts in the fabric of space
caused by intense gravitational fields such as those found around the
collapsed stars known as black holes.
Crawford says that such fields may allow the traveller to enter a
wormhole from one point and then to leave it at another, possibly
thousands of light years away.
Previously, scientists have assumed that any astronaut who was caught in
such a powerful gravitational field would be pulled into something
resembling a piece of spaghetti.
However, Crawford said last week that recent research had suggested
wormholes could be stabilised and manipulated to create short cuts
between any two points in space. "The proofs are complex and
mathematical, but more and more astrophysicists are satisfied that in
theory it is possible," he said.
Should wormholes fail, however, Crawford proposes a second possible route
to the stars. He draws on a recent paper by Miguel Alcubierre, of the
University of Wales, in the journal Classical and Quantum Gravity to
suggest the possibility of propulsion systems which distort space by
compressing it in front of a spaceship while expanding it behind.
Such a system would effectively bend space, creating a form of "warp
drive" reminiscent of the Starship Enterprise of Captain James T Kirk in
Star Trek.
The theories will boost growing interest among scientists in the
possibility of travelling faster than light. The IPS, whose members
include several NASA engineers, starts its first conference shortly in
Halifax, Nova Scotia.
Patrick Moore, the astronomer and presenter of The Sky At Night, said he
believed interstellar travel would one day be achieved. "Television would
have seemed impossible 200 years ago and faster than light travel is no
more outrageous than that," he said.
Arthur C Clarke, the science fiction writer and futurologist, was equally
enthusiastic. His first novel, Against The Fall Of Night, published in
1932, presumed that man would be able to travel faster than light.
Speaking from his home in Colombo, Sri Lanka, he said: "That was just a
dramatic device which all science fiction writers have to use in space
travel, but I have always believed it may one day be possible."
Sir Martin Rees, the astronomer royal and professor of astronomy at
Cambridge University, was more cautious, however, saying the proofs were
purely theoretical.
|
| |
|
05-14-2008, 09:04 AM
|
#37 (permalink)
|
|
Bad Guy
| Location:
http://headbanger.aforumfree.com/ |
Status:
|
|
You people need to find Monteperlin and read his sig, because you have no idea what you're talking about.
__________________
"Headbanger is a legit crack addict and has shit for brains. His ability to weave together slices of reality with totally non-sequitor, asinine points of bullshit is simply astonishing." -Octavian
|
| |
|
05-14-2008, 09:05 AM
|
#38 (permalink)
|
|
Bad Guy
| Location:
http://headbanger.aforumfree.com/ |
Status:
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GOD_OF_MUAYTHAI
Astronomers predict faster- than- light travel based
[From "The Sunday Times" (UK) 13th August 1995]
ASTRONOMERS PREDICT FASTER THAN LIGHT SPACE TRAVEL
It is boldly going where no reputable scientific body has gone before.
Contradicting Einstein, the normally conservative Royal Astronomical
Society is about to publish a report predicting that mankind will be able
to travel faster than the speed of light.
The breakthrough means that Star Trek fantasies of interstellar
civilisations and voyages powered by warp drive are now no longer the
exclusive domain of science fiction writers.
The report was written by Ian Crawford, an astronomer at University
College London, who believes not only that man will one day see stars at
close quarters, but that we had better start preparing ourselves for the
consequences, including contact with aliens.
His paper, Some Thoughts On The Implications Of Faster-Than-Light Travel,
has been validated by independent referees in the scientific community
and will be published next month. Its publication coincides with the
formation by British and American scientists of the Interstellar
Propulsion Society (IPS) which is dedicated to finding a means of taking
astronauts to the stars.
Crawford argues that modern physics may allow two possible ways around
Einstein's theory, which says that because bodies have infinite mass at
the speed of light, no amount of energy can make them go faster.
The first is to pass through "wormholes", rifts in the fabric of space
caused by intense gravitational fields such as those found around the
collapsed stars known as black holes.
Crawford says that such fields may allow the traveller to enter a
wormhole from one point and then to leave it at another, possibly
thousands of light years away.
Previously, scientists have assumed that any astronaut who was caught in
such a powerful gravitational field would be pulled into something
resembling a piece of spaghetti.
However, Crawford said last week that recent research had suggested
wormholes could be stabilised and manipulated to create short cuts
between any two points in space. "The proofs are complex and
mathematical, but more and more astrophysicists are satisfied that in
theory it is possible," he said.
Should wormholes fail, however, Crawford proposes a second possible route
to the stars. He draws on a recent paper by Miguel Alcubierre, of the
University of Wales, in the journal Classical and Quantum Gravity to
suggest the possibility of propulsion systems which distort space by
compressing it in front of a spaceship while expanding it behind.
Such a system would effectively bend space, creating a form of "warp
drive" reminiscent of the Starship Enterprise of Captain James T Kirk in
Star Trek.
The theories will boost growing interest among scientists in the
possibility of travelling faster than light. The IPS, whose members
include several NASA engineers, starts its first conference shortly in
Halifax, Nova Scotia.
Patrick Moore, the astronomer and presenter of The Sky At Night, said he
believed interstellar travel would one day be achieved. "Television would
have seemed impossible 200 years ago and faster than light travel is no
more outrageous than that," he said.
Arthur C Clarke, the science fiction writer and futurologist, was equally
enthusiastic. His first novel, Against The Fall Of Night, published in
1932, presumed that man would be able to travel faster than light.
Speaking from his home in Colombo, Sri Lanka, he said: "That was just a
dramatic device which all science fiction writers have to use in space
travel, but I have always believed it may one day be possible."
Sir Martin Rees, the astronomer royal and professor of astronomy at
Cambridge University, was more cautious, however, saying the proofs were
purely theoretical.
|
Be sure to let me know when this gets published. 
__________________
"Headbanger is a legit crack addict and has shit for brains. His ability to weave together slices of reality with totally non-sequitor, asinine points of bullshit is simply astonishing." -Octavian
|
| |
|
05-14-2008, 09:06 AM
|
#39 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Status:
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HeadBanger
That's impossible, the speed of light is the speed limit of the Universe.
|
who envisioned a plasma tv or a hdtv 100 years ago ? ftl is not specifically ruled out and there are ways around it
|
| |
|
05-14-2008, 09:07 AM
|
#40 (permalink)
|
|
Bad Guy
| Location:
http://headbanger.aforumfree.com/ |
Status:
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GOD_OF_MUAYTHAI
who envisioned a plasma tv or a hdtv 100 years ago ? ftl is not specifically ruled out and there are ways around it
|
Dude, nothing. Just be sure to let me know when this gets published.
__________________
"Headbanger is a legit crack addict and has shit for brains. His ability to weave together slices of reality with totally non-sequitor, asinine points of bullshit is simply astonishing." -Octavian
|
| |
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|