Urgent Message To All My Friends In The "9/11 Truth Movement"

[Gregster]

It's about 8:15 PM EST right now, and on the History Channels' Modern Marvels series, the focus tonight in on demolitions with a particular focus on deliberate/controlled demolitions.

If you were watching right now, you'd likely see the massive, herculean effort in terms of planning, logistics, set-up, and execution involved in dropping an abandoned 14-story office building in the sort of "nice, neat, controlled manner" that the 9/11 conspiracy set likens to the WTC collapses as compelling evidence if not incontroveritable, damning, slam-dunk proof that controlled demolition was the mode of destruction.

If you believe that the WTC collapse was the result of controlled demolition while also possessed of the sort of open-minded, dispassionate, questioning state of mind that folks who adhere to this theory (or at least lean heavily towards it) constantly lay claim to, you might watch the aforementioned process (still being chronicled in detail as I type this, by the by) and then wonder in that detached, unemotional manner with which you use in sifting the wheat of truth from the chaff of lies, bluffing, and misdirection how this process could conceivably be extrapolated on to a building over three times that height and two others almost eight times as high, all fully occupied and continually trafficked by office tenants, Port Authority support staffers, and tourists in the middle of busy downtown Manhatten without a soul catching wise to it.

P.S. wouldn't you know, they're doing a segment right now on teams of controlled demo experts who were called into to basically finish the job and safely drop the remaining, not-quite-collapsed parts and use their expertise to help the cleanup and rescue crews work. So far, no "Golly, I couldn't help but notice how this looked like a controlled demo!" observations from the controlled demo guys. But I'm still looking.

Of course, if you miss it, you can prolly catch it another time.

[icantstandit]

Gregster, of course you are an intelligent.

Don't you know that the History Channel has very close links to the government, and that the Channel is populated with historians, experts and other people, some of whom actually worked for the government in the past?

That show has been thoroughly debunked, and those were obvious actors. Just read it on this website here: www.prisonplanet.com

[Gregster]

Originally Posted by icantstandit

Gregster, of course you are an intelligent.

Don't you know that the History Channel has very close links to the government, and that the Channel is populated with historians, experts and other people, some of whom actually worked for the government in the past?

That show has been thoroughly debunked, and those were obvious actors. Just read it on this website here: www.prisonplanet.com

As it happens, one of the things I am truly looking forward to is having it explained to me why The History Channel is, in reality unbeknownst to all us sheeple as well as the folks who started watching Fox News on Sunday instead of going to church, really a clever front for government agents to spread misinformation and shill the official line to counteract the fifth estate trying to expose their corporate/political overlords.

[CraftyGrappler]

*yawn*

[GermanBJJ]

Originally Posted by Gregster

It's about 8:15 PM EST right now, and on the History Channels' Modern Marvels series, the focus tonight in on demolitions with a particular focus on deliberate/controlled demolitions.

If you were watching right now, you'd likely see the massive, herculean effort in terms of planning, logistics, set-up, and execution involved in dropping an abandoned 14-story office building in the sort of "nice, neat, controlled manner" that the 9/11 conspiracy set likens to the WTC collapses as compelling evidence if not incontroveritable, damning, slam-dunk proof that controlled demolition was the mode of destruction.

If you believe that the WTC collapse was the result of controlled demolition while also possessed of the sort of open-minded, dispassionate, questioning state of mind that folks who adhere to this theory (or at least lean heavily towards it) constantly lay claim to, you might watch the aforementioned process (still being chronicled in detail as I type this, by the by) and then wonder in that detached, unemotional manner with which you use in sifting the wheat of truth from the chaff of lies, bluffing, and misdirection how this process could conceivably be extrapolated on to a building over three times that height and two others almost eight times as high, all fully occupied and continually trafficked by office tenants, Port Authority support staffers, and tourists in the middle of busy downtown Manhatten without a soul catching wise to it.

P.S. wouldn't you know, they're doing a segment right now on teams of controlled demo experts who were called into to basically finish the job and safely drop the remaining, not-quite-collapsed parts and use their expertise to help the cleanup and rescue crews work. So far, no "Golly, I couldn't help but notice how this looked like a controlled demo!" observations from the controlled demo guys. But I'm still looking.

Of course, if you miss it, you can prolly catch it another time.

Actually, this could be supporting evidence for CT's. They could simply state that it DOES take a massive effort to drop a building in a nice and neat manner and yet, we are supposed to believe a 747 hitting a building at hundreds of miles per hour and melting infrastructure also caused a nice, neat demolition?

What are the chances something that is only achieved by massive planning is duplicated by a 747 crash and melted infrastructure? Very slim chances, that's what.

So this really doesn't prove anything one way or another.

[computer fogie]

GBJJ, I'm starting to develop an unhealthy man crush on you.

[Darkballs]

stephen hawking was asked his opinion on whether he believed the events of 9-11 was a government orchastrated event. his quote was that people who believed it were (computerized voice) "fucking retarded"
source: me

[Ultrashogun]

Originally Posted by GermanBJJ

Actually, this could be supporting evidence for CT's. They could simply state that it DOES take a massive effort to drop a building in a nice and neat manner and yet, we are supposed to believe a 747 hitting a building at hundreds of miles per hour and melting infrastructure also caused a nice, neat demolition?

What are the chances something that is only achieved by massive planning is duplicated by a 747 crash and melted infrastructure? Very slim chances, that's what.

So this really doesn't prove anything one way or another.

Exactly, I was thinking the exact same thing when I read the OP.

[PhxJudoJujitsu]

Originally Posted by icantstandit

Gregster, of course you are an intelligent.

Don't you know that the History Channel has very close links to the government, and that the Channel is populated with historians, experts and other people, some of whom actually worked for the government in the past?

That show has been thoroughly debunked, and those were obvious actors. Just read it on this website here: www.prisonplanet.com

Your right dude, the History Channel, in an effort to conceal how easily a 115 story building can be taken down, while staying open to the public with no eye witnesses, is making a controlled demo of a 14 story building look much harder than it really is

[PhxJudoJujitsu]

Originally Posted by GermanBJJ

Actually, this could be supporting evidence for CT's. They could simply state that it DOES take a massive effort to drop a building in a nice and neat manner and yet, we are supposed to believe a 747 hitting a building at hundreds of miles per hour and melting infrastructure also caused a nice, neat demolition?

What are the chances something that is only achieved by massive planning is duplicated by a 747 crash and melted infrastructure? Very slim chances, that's what.

So this really doesn't prove anything one way or another.

If it takes a crew that big to bring down a 14 story building with monts of prep work in plain site of everyone. How many people would it take to bring down Two 115 story buildings, that are never closed and there are no eye witnesses who have come forward in the past 6 years to say they saw demo prep work being done. If the Govt really wanted to bring down the WTCs #1 and #2, wouldn't have been easier to simply blow it up with a couple vans and dead "terrorists" in the basement so they could easily identify the terrorist. How long would it take to bring down two 110 plus story buildings while concealing all the work from the public. You would imagine if it takes a crew of well over a 100 for 14 story building it would take a thousand plus for the WTC. How come no one came forward in 6 plus years to say they saw something. Scooter Libby is gonna go down for outing a CIA spy, yet we can't find one person who saw any pre demo work on the WTC?