Save
Random Shot: 
 

Welcome to the Sherdog Mixed Martial Arts Forums forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

 

Go Back  Sherdog Mixed Martial Arts Forums > General Discussion > The War Room > Senator tries to bar Repubs from Adopting

Reply
 
Sherdog Forums
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-10-2007, 03:12 AM   #41 (permalink)

Brown Belt
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,382
Status: James Bomb is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enraged Mongol View Post
I revoke your life. What now?
You choke on a dickwich?

Seriously, your gimmick is lame and you are a fucking putz. Nothing you've posted in this thread has been the least bit enlightening or persuasive, even though you've tried very hard. Maybe you ought to examine where your life is going and re-prioritize.

And you're welcome by the way.
James Bomb is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote

Old 12-10-2007, 05:06 AM   #42 (permalink)

Green Belt
 
Marsupial's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Orqwith
Posts: 1,351
Status: Marsupial is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enraged Mongol View Post
Homos and kids should not mix. Showing kids that it is okay to be a homo makes them grow up accepting them. This is bad. We shouldnt be allowing such ethics in this country.
So what's your final solution to the problem of all these "homos"?
__________________
Jesus didn't tap..........he verbally submitted (Matthew 27:46)
Marsupial is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2007, 05:24 AM   #43 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nibiru
Posts: 5,000
Status: Xenu is offline
This thread is a partial birth abortion.

Who bumped this?
Xenu is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2007, 10:53 PM   #44 (permalink)

White Belt
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 5
Status: Bitsy is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enraged Mongol View Post
What about the bodily integrity of the baby? The innocent baby that hasnt committed any sins, and doesnt sleep around like his mother.
There is NO BABY. Babies lie in cribs, smile and drink milk. An embryo/fetus has no right to bodily autonomy until it's in charge of and has an interest in its own body.

So tell us: What CRIME has a pregnant woman committed that she would lose her bodily autonomy rights?

Free clue: "sleeping around" is not a crime.
Bitsy is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2007, 11:54 PM   #45 (permalink)

White Belt
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 5
Status: Bitsy is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enraged Mongol View Post
They do have the same rights, true. But when they have sex, they are KNOWINGLY taking a risk where they understand that they may become pregnant. WHEN THAT HAPPENS, the baby has a life too. If she doesn't want anyone intruding on HER BODY, then she should CONTROL HER HORMONES and stop fucking everything in sight.
An amazing display of ignorance and/or stupidity. Do they give out crack for free at your anti-choice meetings, or what? Every time I have sex, I explicitly give NO consent to pregnancy. This is obvious since the point to my sex is recreation, not procreation.

Consent to sex is not consent to pregnancy anymore than a woman consents to being raped when she wears a short skirt. A pedestrian does not consent to being run down while walking on the sidewalk.

Control your own hormones, you freak, and quit worrying what happens in the privacy of others bedrooms.
Bitsy is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2007, 01:14 AM   #46 (permalink)

White Belt
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 5
Status: Bitsy is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enraged Mongol View Post
Actually, scientifically speaking, it is accepted that as soon as the egg is fertilized, the embryo is a living being.
Did you know that you are pretty stupid? For example, identical twins are NOT the products of fertilization, they are the products of cloning. And what about the cases where the fertilized egg develops instead into something which is nothing like a child?

Quote:
A LIVING BEING, with a soul and a future. Nowhere in the constitution does it say that a woman has the right to kill a baby because the baby is in her stomach.
God puts a soul into each fertilized egg at conception?! Well, what happens when that zygote twins? That one soul has to do for two people, right? Unless, ohmygod, one of the twins gets the soul, and the other is walking around soulless!!

Further, the right to self defense is NOWHERE mentioned in the constitution. Do YOU have that right or don't you?

When are you going to grow some gonads and answer the question?
Bitsy is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote

Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin Version {1. Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2008 Sherdog.com | Privacy Policy | Click here to advertise on Sherdog