Save
Random Shot: 
 

Welcome to the Sherdog Mixed Martial Arts Forums forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

 

Go Back  Sherdog Mixed Martial Arts Forums > General Discussion > The War Room > Senator tries to bar Repubs from Adopting

Reply
 
Sherdog Forums
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-03-2006, 11:28 PM   #1 (permalink)

Blue Belt
 
MetalChick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 600
Status: MetalChick is offline
Send a message via MSN to MetalChick
Senator tries to bar Repubs from Adopting

Ohio lawmaker to propose ban on GOP adoption
BY CARL CHANCELLOR
Knight Ridder Newspapers

AKRON, Ohio - If an Ohio lawmaker's proposal becomes state law, Republicans would be barred from being adoptive parents.

State Sen. Robert Hagan sent out e-mails to fellow lawmakers late Wednesday night, stating that he intends to "introduce legislation in the near future that would ban households with one or more Republican voters from adopting children or acting as foster parents." The e-mail ended with a request for co-sponsorship.

On Thursday, the Youngstown Democrat said he had not yet found a co-sponsor.

Hagan said his "tongue was planted firmly in cheek" when he drafted the proposed legislation. However, Hagan said that the point he is trying to make is nonetheless very serious.

Hagan said his legislation was written in response to a bill introduced in the Ohio House this month by state Rep. Ron Hood, R-Ashville, that is aimed at prohibiting gay adoption.

"We need to see what we are doing," said Hagan, who called Hood's proposed bill blatantly discriminatory and extremely divisive. Hagan called Hood and the eight other conservative House Republicans who backed the anti-gay adoption bill "homophobic."

Hood's bill, which does not have support of House leadership, seeks to ban children from being placed for adoption or foster care in homes where the prospective parent or a roommate is homosexual, bisexual or transgender.

To further lampoon Hood's bill, Hagan wrote in his mock proposal that "credible research" shows that adopted children raised in Republican households are more at risk for developing "emotional problems, social stigmas, inflated egos, and alarming lack of tolerance for others they deem different than themselves and an air of overconfidence to mask their insecurities."

However, Hagan admitted that he has no scientific evidence to support the above claims.

Just as "Hood had no scientific evidence" to back his assertion that having gay parents was detrimental to children, Hagan said.

"It flies in the face of reason when we need to reform our education system, address health care and environmental issues that we put energy and wasted time (into) legislation (Hood's) like this," continued Hagan, who has been in the Ohio Senate nine years. Before the Senate, he served 19 years in the Ohio House.

Sourcehttp://www.bradenton.com/mld/bradent...n/13945272.htm



State Sen. Bob Hagan, a Democrat from Youngstown, mocked a recent House Republican proposal to ban adoption by gay couples - by proposing a ban of his own.

In a memo sent to all Senate colleagues, Hagan wrote: "I intend to introduce legislation in the near future that would ban households with one or more Republican voters from adopting children or acting as foster parents."

Hagan said his fake bill was modeled after one introduced this month by Republican Reps. Tom Brinkman of Mount Lookout, Ron Hood of Ashville and others that would bar homosexual, bisexual and transgender people from adopting.

, "I have spoken to many adopted children raised in Republican households who have admitted that, 'Well, it's just plain boring most of the time,' " Hagan wrote. "In fact, one adopted child raised in a fiercely partisan Republican household in suburban Cincinnati described his upbringing as '18 years of hellish terror.' "

Senate Democratic spokeswoman Amanda Conn Starner said, "The request Hagan is making is as crazy in concept as Hood's proposal is to ban gays from adopting kids and keeping them from loving homes."

Sourcehttp://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.d...0354/-1/back01

And no that isn't the NATIONAL Enquirer

Quote:
, "I have spoken to many adopted children raised in Republican households who have admitted that, 'Well, it's just plain boring most of the time,' " Hagan wrote. "In fact, one adopted child raised in a fiercely partisan Republican household in suburban Cincinnati described his upbringing as '18 years of hellish terror.' "
__________________
****lchick makes me cum heaps - Golden Arms
MetalChick is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote

Old 03-03-2006, 11:30 PM   #2 (permalink)
Skulls rain down upon you
 
Darwinist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Bifröst, Iceland
Posts: 11,553
Status: Darwinist is offline
Send a message via MSN to Darwinist
Nice.
__________________
Scientology is a Dangerous Cult
Darwinist is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2006, 11:41 PM   #3 (permalink)

Purple Belt
 
IRON-E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Perpetual state of intoxication
Posts: 1,985
Status: IRON-E is offline
Nah- I think that anyone that is pro-life should be forced to adopt at least 5 unwanted children. I'd love to see the Cheney household at thanksgiving with 5 or 6 crack babies gathered around the table.
__________________
"I want to die when I'm old, shitting in my pants like everyone else and remembering who I was."

-Renzo Gracie
IRON-E is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2006, 12:51 AM   #4 (permalink)

Brown Belt
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,885
Status: James Bomb is offline
That should whip that state's nutso Republicans, like Mean Jean Schmidt, Taft, and Bob Ney, into a frenzy.
James Bomb is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2006, 12:53 AM   #5 (permalink)

Red Belt
 
hypocalking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,898
Status: hypocalking is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRON-E
Nah- I think that anyone that is pro-life should be forced to adopt at least 5 unwanted children. I'd love to see the Cheney household at thanksgiving with 5 or 6 crack babies gathered around the table.
LOL!!Well he could just take them hunting if he got tired of them.
__________________
Brandon "can't handle the truth" Vera
Where the fetal position means you're winning the fight.
hypocalking is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2006, 12:57 AM   #6 (permalink)

Purple Belt
 
IRON-E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Perpetual state of intoxication
Posts: 1,985
Status: IRON-E is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by James Bomb
That should whip that state's nutso Republicans, like Mean Jean Schmidt, Taft, and Bob Ney, into a frenzy.
Hagan wrote it because Ohio is gonna be the second state to outlaw abortion. The Republicans have been waiting for Alito to get his robe so they can whip this red herring out and finally have an issue on which they can claim the moral high ground.

The first attack is a bill currently in the statehouse that would prohibit expecting parents from suing their doctors if the doctors withhold information about diseases or conditions that they feel might lead the prospective parents into aborting the fetus.

Republicans wipe their ass with the constitution again.
__________________
"I want to die when I'm old, shitting in my pants like everyone else and remembering who I was."

-Renzo Gracie
IRON-E is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2006, 01:19 AM   #7 (permalink)
calf cruncher fan
 
punkmother's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Planet Punkmother
Posts: 16,815
Status: punkmother is offline
ohio has, historically speaking, the craziest sons of bitches in office.
__________________
royce who?
punkmother is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2006, 01:58 AM   #8 (permalink)

White Belt
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 104
Status: DPK325 is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by punkmother
ohio has, historically speaking, the craziest sons of bitches in office.
as an Ohio State law student, I agree... but wtf did this mess come to be?
DPK325 is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2006, 02:03 AM   #9 (permalink)

Brown Belt
 
ChiefStrategist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,813
Status: ChiefStrategist is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRON-E
Hagan wrote it because Ohio is gonna be the second state to outlaw abortion. The Republicans have been waiting for Alito to get his robe so they can whip this red herring out and finally have an issue on which they can claim the moral high ground.

The first attack is a bill currently in the statehouse that would prohibit expecting parents from suing their doctors if the doctors withhold information about diseases or conditions that they feel might lead the prospective parents into aborting the fetus.

Republicans wipe their ass with the constitution again.
how do you lefties do it? If at first you don't succeed, Abort, Abort again?

Good to see your advocating killing retarded children, or Children with possible Birth defects. Maybe next you can abort all the kids in utero who won't become blonde haired and blue eyed too.

douchebag

Quote:
Republicans wipe their ass with the constitution again.
show me where in the constitution where the term abortion come up, Go ahead...I'll wait
__________________
CONDUCTOR OF THE RON PAUL EXPRESS...THE PAIN TRAIN IS COMIN' BABY...WOO-WOO....WOO-WOO
ChiefStrategist is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2006, 02:10 AM   #10 (permalink)

White Belt
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 104
Status: DPK325 is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiefStrategist
Good to see your advocating killing retarded children
Better than supporting it when they are 30 years old and have a family, a job, a life
By the way,there are lots of constituational rights that arent in the constitution. Basically any restrictiion applied to the states isnt directly in the constitution but has been moved there by the 14th amenment pretty much on the whim of the judge. But judges are told to interpret, and when the 14th amendment says it requires inalienable rights to process in state court as well as federal, who should interpret what inalieble means other than *SHUDDER* "activist" judges!
__________________
Randy, GSP, Ace, Babalu, Mayhem. Genki Sudo, Frank Mir
-------
Member since 2004 (old account broke.)
To those with high post-counts: reading posts, not making them, increases your MMA knowledge
DPK325 is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote

Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin Version {1. Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2008 Sherdog.com | Privacy Policy | Click here to advertise on Sherdog