Save
Random Shot: 
 

Welcome to the Sherdog Mixed Martial Arts Forums forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

 

Go Back  Sherdog Mixed Martial Arts Forums > General Discussion > The War Room > Pentagon tells Iraqi PM al-Maliki to request war against Iran

Reply
 
Sherdog Forums
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-01-2008, 11:09 AM   #11 (permalink)

Brown Belt
 
Pridelives's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Canada eh!
Posts: 2,646
Status: Pridelives is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by InternetHero View Post
Watch the personal attacks blah blah blah read the WR rules again "genius".

Pridelivies:"They want to control Iraq with a Shia majority, they want to control the region, they are not hell bent on killing Americans."

That's damn well what they are trying to do and that's why they are pumping the weapons in there and have been stirring things up since the beginning.

Weird, you're agreeing with me in a disagreeing tone.
__________________
Many have made a trade of delusions and false miracles, deceiving the stupid multitude.

-Leonardo Da Vinci.
Pridelives is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote

Old 05-01-2008, 11:12 AM   #12 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: St. Elizabeth’s Hospital
Posts: 2,461
Status: Ezra Pound is offline
Icon14

Quote:
Originally Posted by GermanBJJ View Post
And you don't know if they are even there or where they came from either. You state it as a fact but some foreign governments (including Britain) have contradicted US claims of weaponry coming from Iran. I am not saying Iran isn't giving support and weapons, I am just saying (a) the evidence we have right now isn't very clear-cut and (b) the evidence we haven't been told about hasn't been released.

When that evidence is released, we can evaluation possible solutions to that problem. But given our past mistakes, I think it is prudent to be more suspicious and cautious about weapons claims going forward.
I'm glad you said that, I didn't want to point that out to the ignorant warmongers all by myself.
Ezra Pound is offline  | 
Icon14 Icon14 Icon14  
   
Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2008, 11:13 AM   #13 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: St. Elizabeth’s Hospital
Posts: 2,461
Status: Ezra Pound is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by InternetHero View Post
Fair enough. I'm not sure the British have "disputed" the claims as much as they have disputed some claims. And seeing as the reports keep coming and the evidence has been mounting rather than decreasing that points to Iranian involvement (A lot of Iranian involvement at that.) I believe the intelligence, and I find it hard to believe that the Bush Administration would choose now to attack Iran (Because here is no way in hell the U.S. would invade. Note: It is not militarily viable to any "brilliant" CT WR poster who would argue otherwise.) when it would

A. Not be politically popular at-all in the U.S. and B. When despite Iran's provocations the U.S. has been much more successful of late in Iraq.
So are you like a Japanese Zionist (ridiculous concept, need to learn history) or are you just a US soldier stationed at a base?
Ezra Pound is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2008, 11:17 AM   #14 (permalink)

Black Belt
 
Sauron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: downstairs
Posts: 6,654
Status: Sauron is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pridelives View Post
Do you people from the U.S still buy this propaganda?
Do you even need to ask?

If Bush told them the earth was flat they'd believe it.
__________________
Messenger: My Lord, news: the Swiss have invaded France.
King: Wessex, while they're away, take 10,000 troops and pillage Geneva.
Lord Chiswick: But the Swiss are our allies, My Lord.
Sauron is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2008, 11:46 AM   #15 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: St. Elizabeth’s Hospital
Posts: 2,461
Status: Ezra Pound is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sauron View Post
Do you even need to ask?

If Bush told them the earth was flat they'd believe it.
LOL sad but true, plenty of doggers would take it as gospel.
Ezra Pound is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2008, 11:51 AM   #16 (permalink)
Cultural Engineer
 
Nietzsche13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Outskirts of Infinity
Posts: 20,360
Status: Nietzsche13 is offline
If Al Maliki is in charge of our military now, deciding if we go to war against Iran, it will be an outrage.

What the F is going on with these idiots in Washington? Thankyou may I have another.
__________________
Fundamentally strong means that the american people can still carry the burden of additional bullshit before reaching the break point.

M*V=P*Q > E=MC2
Nietzsche13 is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2008, 11:56 AM   #17 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: St. Elizabeth’s Hospital
Posts: 2,461
Status: Ezra Pound is offline
Icon9

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nietzsche13 View Post
If Al Maliki is in charge of our military now, deciding if we go to war against Iran, it will be an outrage.

What the F is going on with these idiots in Washington? Thankyou may I have another.
Just go to work and pay your taxes slave.
Ezra Pound is offline  | 
Icon9 Icon9 Icon9  
   
Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2008, 11:59 AM   #18 (permalink)

Blue Belt
 
logos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Corpus Christi, Tx.
Posts: 775
Status: logos is offline
I don't think there is any question that Iran is fueling instability in Iraq. It is to be expected, just look at what we did to the Soviets during the Afghan conflict. That being said, I do not think the American people, or the International community would stomach an inavasion of Iran. Besides, I do not think it is even possible, we do not have the recources or the troops to mount such an operation.
logos is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2008, 12:03 PM   #19 (permalink)

Blue Belt
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 618
Status: Rear NakedChoke is offline
I find it funny that people don't put 2 and 2 together. USA's number one export is weapons. If there is no war who needs weapons.
Rear NakedChoke is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2008, 12:05 PM   #20 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nibiru
Posts: 5,000
Status: Xenu is offline
US Overlords Have Spoken

"Dance puppets, dance!"
Xenu is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote

Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ban The Bomb - But Only In Iran Marsupial The War Room 35 12-16-2007 09:36 AM
Is America going ot war with Iran? Allyouneedis316 The War Room 42 11-29-2007 03:29 PM
Iran gave al-Qaeda in Iraq SAM-7 missiles constitution The War Room 39 07-12-2007 03:00 PM
Rice, Cheney split over military action against Iran walnut The War Room 24 06-20-2007 06:19 PM
Al-Qaeda spark for an Iran-US fire flatline The War Room 46 06-07-2007 04:50 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin Version {1. Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2008 Sherdog.com | Privacy Policy | Click here to advertise on Sherdog