[BadassHo]

^ true.

but which holds better judgement.

pakistan has a better army than iran, and has nukes. not great idea to let obama fuck with them.

iran has a weaker army, and no nukes. and we wish to keep it that way.

[Wolverine Frog]

US relationship with Pakistan has always been tenuous at best

[Pridelives]

Pakistan recieved funs but was never an "ally".

[InternetHero]

Man I hope nobody makes any cartoons depicting the prophet in an unfavorable light.

That might REALLY piss them off.

[choycheese]

Originally Posted by BadassHo

^ true.

but which holds better judgement.

pakistan has a better army than iran, and has nukes. not great idea to let obama fuck with them.

iran has a weaker army, and no nukes. and we wish to keep it that way.

That's some great logic. Bin Ladin and al queada, the guys who attacked us, are in Pakistan. But Iran has a weaker army, so let's attack them instead. You sure you don't work in the White House?

[Maximinus Thrax]

Hindsight is always 20/20, but alliance with Pakistan might have been a big strategic blunder in the long run. Musharraf wants to bring the country into the 20th century; the problem is that it's still in the 10th. The United States is trying to force them into democratic government, but that is just not possible with a population that is barely half literate. He is losing the war against militancy, almost hopelessly, and now they have nukes...

We should have built stronger ties with India, an emerging powerhouse on the international stage. Unfortunately we alienated them in favor of a bunch of psychotics and illiterates.

[Wolverine Frog]

Originally Posted by Maximinus Thrax

Hindsight is always 20/20, but alliance with Pakistan might have been a big strategic blunder in the long run. Musharraf wants to bring the country into the 20th century; the problem is that it's still in the 10th. The United States is trying to force them into democratic government, but that is just not possible with a population that is barely half literate. He is losing the war against militancy, almost hopelessly, and now they have nukes...

We should have built stronger ties with India, an emerging powerhouse on the international stage. Unfortunately we alienated them in favor of a bunch of psychotics and illiterates.

Good analysis but prepared to be taken to task for calling Pakistanis 'psychotics and illiterates'. Those terms are reserved for describing the denizens of Washington ONLY!

[BadassHo]

Originally Posted by choycheese

That's some great logic. Bin Ladin and al queada, the guys who attacked us, are in Pakistan. But Iran has a weaker army, so let's attack them instead. You sure you don't work in the White House?

i'm just saying which option out of the two hurts us more? bin laden is irrelevant now, we didnt even martyr him. now they try to stay important but still just sit in caves.

[Xenu]

Originally Posted by Saith

It's not a problem. Once Obama is President we'll just invade Pakistan anyway.

Does this mean that we've already invaded Pakistan? Because striking in Pakistan without Pakistan's preapproval (as we've just done) is just what Obama suggested.

And what's with you idiots posting about Obama in every thread?

[BadassHo]

obama said invade their country.

Obama would consider sending troops into Pakistan - USATODAY.com


thats real good judgement. do you think our troops would get nuked by a nuclear power defending its borders?