Sherdog Mixed Martial Arts Forums

Go Back   Sherdog Mixed Martial Arts Forums > General Discussion > Off-Topic > The War Room


The War Room Gun-toting neocon? Tree-hugging lib? Duke it out in the War Room.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-27-2006, 02:00 PM   #1 (permalink)

Brown Belt
 
stevus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: I think we're parked, man
Posts: 3,592
Iran Doubling The Nuclear Process

Iran reportedly expanding nuclear activities
By David E. Sanger The New York Times

Published: October 23, 2006


WASHINGTON The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency said Monday that Iran had begun testing new uranium enrichment equipment that would double the capacity of its small research-and-development facilities.

The action would appear to be a signal to the United Nations Security Council that Iran would respond to sanctions by speeding forward with its nuclear program.

Since February, when Iran publicly celebrated its first production of enriched uranium, progress at its main nuclear complex at Natanz has reportedly been slow. Iran has sporadically operated a single "cascade" of 164 centrifuges, the devices that spin at high speed and turn ordinary uranium into a fuel usable for nuclear power plants - or, at higher enrichment levels, nuclear weapons.

Those reports had prompted speculation that Iranian engineers have run into considerable technical difficulties.

But in an interview on Monday, Mohammed ElBaradei, the director general of the I.A.E.A., said that "based on our most recent inspections, the second centrifuge cascade is in place and ready to go." He said that no uranium had yet been entered into the new system, but could be as early as next week.

Even with two cascades running, it would take years for Iran to produce enough enriched uranium to produce a single nuclear weapon.

The United States director of national intelligence, John D. Negroponte, has said repeatedly that he believes Tehran is 4 to 10 years away from developing a weapon, even though its technology base is far more advanced than that of North Korea, which conducted a nuclear test 15 days ago.

Unlike Pyongyang, Iran has insisted that it does not intend to build a weapon. Nonetheless, Iran ignored an Aug. 31 deadline, set by the Security Council, to stop enriching uranium.

Since then, European nations, China, Russia and the United States have been debating what sanctions, if any, should be imposed. China and Russia have resisted, and in a speech Monday at Georgetown University's school of foreign service, ElBaradei made clear that he believes sanctions are unlikely to work.

"Penalizing them is not a solution," he said. "At the end of the day, we have to bite the bullet and talk to North Korea and Iran."

Unlike American officials, he said he remained unpersuaded that Iran's ultimate goal is to build a weapon, although I.A.E.A. officials believe that Iran wants to have all of the major components of a weapon in hand so that it is clear that it could build one in weeks or months.

"The jury is still out on whether they are developing a nuclear weapon," ElBaradei said at Georgetown, after meeting earlier in the day with Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.

After the meeting, Sean McCormack, the State Department spokesman, said there was now "widespread agreement, although not total agreement," on elements of an initial sanctions package. He would not speculate about when the sanctions might come to a vote; at the end of the summer, Bush administration officials insisted the security council would act in September.

McCormack noted that the Iranians seemed to be moving ahead "inexorably at this point," so that at some point "you will have industrial-scale production. You don't want that."

Some European diplomats have expressed concern that should the Security Council act, the moderates in the Iranian government who have been involved in negotiations over the nuclear program could be shoved aside, and that some combination of military leaders and hard-line mullahs would push the country to speed its nuclear production.

WASHINGTON The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency said Monday that Iran had begun testing new uranium enrichment equipment that would double the capacity of its small research-and-development facilities.

The action would appear to be a signal to the United Nations Security Council that Iran would respond to sanctions by speeding forward with its nuclear program.

Since February, when Iran publicly celebrated its first production of enriched uranium, progress at its main nuclear complex at Natanz has reportedly been slow. Iran has sporadically operated a single "cascade" of 164 centrifuges, the devices that spin at high speed and turn ordinary uranium into a fuel usable for nuclear power plants - or, at higher enrichment levels, nuclear weapons.

Those reports had prompted speculation that Iranian engineers have run into considerable technical difficulties.

But in an interview on Monday, Mohammed ElBaradei, the director general of the I.A.E.A., said that "based on our most recent inspections, the second centrifuge cascade is in place and ready to go." He said that no uranium had yet been entered into the new system, but could be as early as next week.

Even with two cascades running, it would take years for Iran to produce enough enriched uranium to produce a single nuclear weapon.

The United States director of national intelligence, John D. Negroponte, has said repeatedly that he believes Tehran is 4 to 10 years away from developing a weapon, even though its technology base is far more advanced than that of North Korea, which conducted a nuclear test 15 days ago.

Unlike Pyongyang, Iran has insisted that it does not intend to build a weapon. Nonetheless, Iran ignored an Aug. 31 deadline, set by the Security Council, to stop enriching uranium.

Since then, European nations, China, Russia and the United States have been debating what sanctions, if any, should be imposed. China and Russia have resisted, and in a speech Monday at Georgetown University's school of foreign service, ElBaradei made clear that he believes sanctions are unlikely to work.

"Penalizing them is not a solution," he said. "At the end of the day, we have to bite the bullet and talk to North Korea and Iran."

Unlike American officials, he said he remained unpersuaded that Iran's ultimate goal is to build a weapon, although I.A.E.A. officials believe that Iran wants to have all of the major components of a weapon in hand so that it is clear that it could build one in weeks or months.

"The jury is still out on whether they are developing a nuclear weapon," ElBaradei said at Georgetown, after meeting earlier in the day with Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.

After the meeting, Sean McCormack, the State Department spokesman, said there was now "widespread agreement, although not total agreement," on elements of an initial sanctions package. He would not speculate about when the sanctions might come to a vote; at the end of the summer, Bush administration officials insisted the security council would act in September.

McCormack noted that the Iranians seemed to be moving ahead "inexorably at this point," so that at some point "you will have industrial-scale production. You don't want that."

Some European diplomats have expressed concern that should the Security Council act, the moderates in the Iranian government who have been involved in negotiations over the nuclear program could be shoved aside, and that some combination of military leaders and hard-line mullahs would push the country to speed its nuclear production
stevus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2006, 02:09 PM   #2 (permalink)

Brown Belt
 
stevus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: I think we're parked, man
Posts: 3,592
http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/10/...b.1024iran.php
stevus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2006, 02:49 PM   #3 (permalink)

Brown Belt
 
kartaron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,437
Witness the power of multilateral condemnation from the UN.
__________________
Hey, we are having a nice little discussion here.....please put your Samurai sword away and play nice. Titlefight
kartaron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2006, 03:36 PM   #4 (permalink)

Purple Belt
 
Hog-train's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 2,327
Send a message via AIM to Hog-train
The US can't realistically do anything to stop Iran if they really wanted nukes.
__________________
Losers always talk about trying their best. Winners go home and fuck the prom queen.

"When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in a flag, carrying a cross" - Sinclair Lewis
Hog-train is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2006, 04:06 PM   #5 (permalink)

Brown Belt
 
stevus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: I think we're parked, man
Posts: 3,592
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hog-train
The US can't realistically do anything to stop Iran if they really wanted nukes.
Yep. Iran will eventually have nukes, we just have to hope they don't use 'em. I think Bush should apologize to Iran for calling them "Evil." Iran won't forget a comment like that. It would be crazy to nuke us; Ahmadinijad is not crazy like Kim Jong Il, but Iran could nuke american interests. Then gas prices will go up while the Iranians laugh.
stevus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2006, 04:34 PM   #6 (permalink)
Leather Belt
 
rstrik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hog-train
The US can't realistically do anything to stop Iran if they really wanted nukes.
Realistically we can obliterate the entire country, logically we can support a opposition group to try and overthrow their opressive government or let Israel or our own airforce tatically target their nuclear facilities to put their program back about 20 years.
rstrik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2006, 04:37 PM   #7 (permalink)
Leather Belt
 
rstrik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevus
Yep. Iran will eventually have nukes, we just have to hope they don't use 'em. I think Bush should apologize to Iran for calling them "Evil." Iran won't forget a comment like that. It would be crazy to nuke us; Ahmadinijad is not crazy like Kim Jong Il, but Iran could nuke american interests. Then gas prices will go up while the Iranians laugh.
Kim Jong hasn't made repeated threats to wipe another country off the map, he also hasn't completely denied one of the most horrific events in this worlds history. They are both equally crazy in their own seperate ways.
rstrik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2006, 04:43 PM   #8 (permalink)

Brown Belt
 
stevus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: I think we're parked, man
Posts: 3,592
Quote:
Originally Posted by rstrik
Kim Jong hasn't made repeated threats to wipe another country off the map, he also hasn't completely denied one of the most horrific events in this worlds history. They are both equally crazy in their own seperate ways.
Good point.
stevus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2006, 04:50 PM   #9 (permalink)

Purple Belt
 
Hog-train's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 2,327
Send a message via AIM to Hog-train
Quote:
Originally Posted by rstrik
Realistically we can obliterate the entire country, logically we can support a opposition group to try and overthrow their opressive government or let Israel or our own airforce tatically target their nuclear facilities to put their program back about 20 years.
Realistically means no reasonable person would do it. Yea, in theory we can obliterate the whole world. So I guess you can say, we can "realistically" destroy the world.
__________________
Losers always talk about trying their best. Winners go home and fuck the prom queen.

"When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in a flag, carrying a cross" - Sinclair Lewis
Hog-train is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




Latest Threads



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:51 PM.

Sherdog.com Forum Rules Clear Cookies Social Groups Lost Password

Skin made by Alex. © iStyles.uni.cc Powered by vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2009 Sherdog.com | Click here to advertise on Sherdog