[Salmonella]

Originally Posted by Das Uberdog

the terrorist indorse him 'cuz they want to destroy America and they think Brak can do it. they know the best way to destroy America is have a funny-name President. the terrorists want more Democrats because the Democrast are too scared to blow up people. if we had a Democrast president now Iran would be making nuclear wapons right in our face and North Krea would be trying nuclar tests whenever they wanted!! lol! Democrats are pussies.

Oh yeah, those suicide bombers are afraid of death you know

[IronCage]

Originally Posted by HeadBanger

Ignorance. We are at war, you guys need to start supporting your future President. This is unAmerican.

And the king of irrelevant answers strikes again.

[whiskeyyy]

You could poll every single country in the world and they'd all prefer Obama over McCain.

BREAKING NEWS: Nobody wants another warmongering Republican in office except other warmongering Republicans.

Al Qaeda is probably an exception here though. They'd prefer a Republican seeing as Republican policies have swelled their ranks and transformed their group into a global movement.

[busdriver01]

Originally Posted by whiskeyyy

You could poll every single country in the world and they'd all prefer Obama over McCain.

BREAKING NEWS: Nobody wants another warmongering Republican in office except other warmongering Republicans.

Al Qaeda is probably an exception here though. They'd prefer a Republican seeing as Republican policies have swelled their ranks and transformed their group into a global movement.

Because they weren't international until we invaded Iraq right? It amazes me that people can form such rigged views without knowing the first damn thing about the subject.

[Kippy Winstead]

Originally Posted by BP3

Is this really any surprise? The Democrats had the endorsement of the terrorists in 2006 too.

.

another logical statement

i'm sure usama and the rest of AQ were real upset bush was re-elected... he's done so much damage to them after all...

[BP3]

Originally Posted by brackis1

Thanks for reminding us that Reagan was endorsed by Osama Bin Laden, or was it the other way around ?. Either way you look silly

Allow me to remind you of something else....while Al Quaeda attacked us throughout the 90's, and their strength grew exponentially...B.J. Clinton did absolutely nothing. This is why they want a donkey (or is it ass?) in the white house...they wants to know for certain that they are free to start their reign of terror again.

.

[busdriver01]

Originally Posted by Kippy Winstead

another logical statement

i'm sure usama and the rest of AQ were real upset bush was re-elected... he's done so much damage to them after all...

yes...obviously

So you think AQ is stronger than ever?

[smasheroffaces]

Originally Posted by Kippy Winstead

another logical statement

i'm sure usama and the rest of AQ were real upset bush was re-elected... he's done so much damage to them after all...

do ya know about the aq leaders we have killed and captured im sure ya do. let alone all the aq members we have blown to shit or put bullets through. i dont get the post im sure it was sarcastic. cuz thats how ya do it right. you think aq has been on a camping trip sitting around campfires singing campfire songs or somthing

[BP3]

Originally Posted by Skippy Wimpstead

another logical statement

Your being correct here must be just pure dumb luck...you wouldn't know logic if you took 8-inches of it across the chops.

Originally Posted by Skippy Wimpstead

i'm sure usama and the rest of AQ were real upset bush was re-elected... he's done so much damage to them after all...

Perhaps they weren't....but I'll bet they are now.

American Thinker Blog: Al Qaeda is finished in Iraq: From the Horse's Mouth

Al-Qaeda leaders admit: 'We are in crisis. There is panic and fear' - Times Online

Is al-Qaeda on the Run in Iraq? - TIME

BBC NEWS | World | Middle East | Al-Qaeda in Iraq 'reduced by 75%'

.

[whiskeyyy]

Originally Posted by busdriver01

Because they weren't international until we invaded Iraq right? It amazes me that people can form such rigged views without knowing the first damn thing about the subject.

I never said they weren't international. "Movement" was the key word in what I said and you probably should have bolded that. Obviously they had a membership that spanned various countries. My point is they were a finite self-contained group that has now transcended that and become a global movement. Most of the original AQ guys have been killed and Bin Ladin / Zawahiri have been marginalized on an operational level. It doesn't really matter much because Bush's moronic policies have transformed Al Qaeda into a massive movement that no longer requires any direct participation on behalf of the original Al Qaeda. AQ in Iraq is a perfect example of that. A bunch of foreign Jihadis basically started up a franchise and slapped a logo on it.

If you want a good read on the subject I'd suggest this: Think Again: Al Qaeda

It requires registration to read but it only takes a few seconds.