[HeadBanger]

Originally Posted by brackis1

Which is the dangerous and hate filled reaction to these types of things, which won't fix any of the harm already done. It only serves to further diminish society into lawlessness and misbehavior.
If one of the family members wants to go psycho and try to kill the guy, go ahead, it will only land them in jail and fuck the pregnant child up in the head even more. Let him go to jail and get stabbed by some other sick fuck there.

It will make clear to the child that things like this are unacceptable and that people care, which will probably be better than knowing that scumbag is alive and will be re-introduced back into society at some point.

This kind of thing creates criminals and psychos.

[WUchi]

Originally Posted by hypocalking

I actually had my first sexual experience at 10 but the girl was my same age.

what did she do, touch your wee-wee and said it looked like a mushroom on a stick

[Revolution]

Originally Posted by FoxTrot9R

Nah I think it would serve to rid the world of one more scumbag. Too bad its not Lousiana. I seem to recall reading that they were instituting the deaath penalty in some rape cases

The U.S. Supreme Court has decreed (incorrectly) that no death penalty may be imposed in the absence of a homicide. (The case is Coker v. Georgia, if you care.) I believe the Louisiana statute has something to do with rape and transmitting HIV/AIDS. I may be wrong.
Oddly enough (or not), I wrote a paper in law school arguing that Coker v. Georgia should be overturned. PM me if you want a copy.

[brackis1]

Originally Posted by HeadBanger

It will make clear to the child that things like this are unacceptable and that people care, which will probably be better than know that scumbag is alive and will be re-introduced back into society at some point.

Make it clear?
Like I said, the laws are laws. Things you set down through statutes and don't ebb & flow when some sexual deviant pops up. Who needs it made clear? Every normal person in society knows this is not acceptable behavior, and the sexual deviants are chemical imbalanced to the point where the difference between getting killed versus getting life in prison will not affect their behavior.

[HeadBanger]

Originally Posted by brackis1

Make it clear?
Like I said, the laws are laws. Things you set down through statutes and don't ebb & flow when some sexual deviant pops up. Who needs it made clear? Every normal person in society knows this is not acceptable behavior, and the sexual deviants are chemical imbalanced to the point where the difference between getting killed versus getting life in prison will not affect their behavior.

You're right, I'm sure all of this is very clear to a 10 year old. My mistake.

[FoxTrot9R]

Originally Posted by Revolution

The U.S. Supreme Court has decreed (incorrectly) that no death penalty may be imposed in the absence of a homicide. (The case is Coker v. Georgia, if you care.) I believe the Louisiana statute has something to do with rape and transmitting HIV/AIDS. I may be wrong.
Oddly enough (or not), I wrote a paper in law school arguing that Coker v. Georgia should be overturned. PM me if you want a copy.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/23/us/23death.html

Yeah I had realized The Supremes court in the past. I was hoping they had changed their stance. Apparently they have not as of yet. Hopefully its a matter of time. I dont buy into the whole lock them up bit. Some people should cease to exist. Not every day criminals, but truly heinous deeds.

[brackis1]

Originally Posted by FoxTrot9R

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/23/us/23death.html

Yeah I had realized The Supremes court in the past. I was hoping they had changed their stance. Apparently they have not as of yet. Hopefully its a matter of time. I dont buy into the whole lock them up bit. Some people should cease to exist. Not every day criminals, but truly heinous deeds.

Your perception of their 'existence' is only a social construct predicated by the media. Have a fucktard sit in a 6'x6' box for 50 years interacting with maybe 10 total gaurds in a given year is not existing. You, me, and every person in the world will never see him again.
Again, we can't let these extremely low level and evil people affect our way of life beyond the damages they have already done to their victims. We are pandering to anger and their evil ways if we unnecessarily spend millions of more dollars going for the death penalty, and let them get more attention through a legal circus trial.

The fate of this sick sick man will not be the deterrent for another sick sick man who does the very same thing 10 years from now.

[FoxTrot9R]

Originally Posted by brackis1

Which is the dangerous and hate filled reaction to these types of things, which won't fix any of the harm already done. It only serves to further diminish society into lawlessness and misbehavior.
If one of the family members wants to go psycho and try to kill the guy, go ahead, it will only land them in jail and fuck the pregnant child up in the head even more. Let him go to jail and get stabbed by some other sick fuck there.

Nothing will change what happened. So why let him sit and waste more money then necessary. Also, if you are ambivilent to hi being killed by a family member, or other prisoner, why not let the law handle it? It must not be about morality

[FoxTrot9R]

Originally Posted by brackis1

The fate of this sick sick man will not be the deterrent for another sick sick man who does the very same thing 10 years from now.

Probably true. Which is why I feel letting him sit and rot is a waste of everyones time.

[brackis1]

Originally Posted by FoxTrot9R

Nothing will change what happened. So why let him sit and waste more money then necessary. Also, if you are ambivilent to hi being killed by a family member, or other prisoner, why not let the law handle it? It must not be about morality

Death penalty cases cost millions more than a quick trial and a life sentence.
Use the money to help children and prevent sexual predators from committing crimes instead of burning it on some dude who is beyond repair.