Quote:
Originally Posted by ebe9
Well hey, not everyone shares the same views as politicians in America. Who knows what direction these new democracies will head in. I doubt many of them will even last as long as the US anyway.
|
...this is my understanding...
Here in the United States you have two choices, Republican or Democrat. The problem with this is if your #1 political interest is small Government (Republican), than you are implicitly supporting the Christian-right (Republican), a strong military (Republican), a less environment friendly emphasis (Republican), pro-life (Republican) and isolationism (Republican) whether you like it or not. This is why it seems so backwards to non-Americans looking into the United States' two party system.
In non-US democracies each one of these political interests would represent their own independent political party. When elections are held for seats in Parliament (aka Congress), there is almost never a majority. What these Democracies do after the elections is they have to form a coalition; or in other words assemble alliances with other parties to make a majority [coalition].
For instance, lets say there are a 100 Parliament seats and the following political parties won (said) number of seats:
Small Government Party (26)
Socialist Government Party (16)
Pro-Choice Party (15)
Pro-Life Party (8)
Environment Friendly Party (10)
Big Business Party (6)
Athiest Party (9)
Pro-Christian Party (3)
Globalization Friendly Party (5)
Isolationism Party (2)
Basically the Small Government Party (Republican view in the United States), the Pro-Choice Party (Democratic view in the United States) and the Environment Friendly Party (Democratic view in the United States) could form a coalition with their 51 seats and hold a majority.
If we use the above numbers in the Unite States model, the Democrats would have won the election and the following political views would be (politically) embraced:
Socialist Government, Pro-Choice, Environment Friendly, Atheist (or non religous) and Globalization (strong foriegn policy) platforms.
I could go on and on and most likely be corrected even more, but conceptually I hope to have painted a good generalization of the differences.