Save
Random Shot: 
 

Welcome to the Sherdog Mixed Martial Arts Forums forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

 

Go Back  Sherdog Mixed Martial Arts Forums > General Discussion > The War Room > [Democracy] - Party System

Reply
 
Sherdog Forums
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-08-2007, 07:54 PM   #1 (permalink)

Purple Belt
 
AlphaQup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,037
Status: AlphaQup is offline
[Democracy] - Party System

Just curious how many people here understand why the United States' political system has a two party system and other Democracies throughout the World have a system consisting of multiple parties.
__________________
[QUOTE=IxiaN;17052853]hero, lol. more like puppet[/QUOTE]
AlphaQup is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote

Old 11-08-2007, 07:56 PM   #2 (permalink)

Blue Belt
 
constitution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 787
Status: constitution is offline
your curiosity is too open-ended -- way too many interpretations for such an observation. obviously you have your own single answer. why not share so everyone in here and swarm like sharks? =)
__________________
A WELL REGULATED militia, being NECESSARY to the security of a FREE state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
constitution is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2007, 07:56 PM   #3 (permalink)

Blue Belt
 
constitution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 787
Status: constitution is offline
your curiosity is too open-ended -- way too many interpretations for such an observation. obviously you have your own single answer. why not share so everyone in here and swarm like sharks? =)
__________________
A WELL REGULATED militia, being NECESSARY to the security of a FREE state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
constitution is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2007, 07:56 PM   #4 (permalink)

Blue Belt
 
constitution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 787
Status: constitution is offline
your curiosity is too open-ended -- way too many interpretations for such an observation. obviously you have your own single answer. why not share so everyone in here and swarm like sharks? =)
__________________
A WELL REGULATED militia, being NECESSARY to the security of a FREE state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
constitution is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2007, 07:56 PM   #5 (permalink)

Blue Belt
 
constitution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 787
Status: constitution is offline
your curiosity is too open-ended -- way too many interpretations for such an observation. obviously you have your own single answer. why not share so everyone in here and swarm like sharks? =)
__________________
A WELL REGULATED militia, being NECESSARY to the security of a FREE state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
constitution is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2007, 07:58 PM   #6 (permalink)

Blue Belt
 
ebe9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Leocadia
Posts: 882
Status: ebe9 is offline
Well there were a few other parties back in the day (Whigs, Federalists along with democrats and republicans) but they eventually died out or integrated with the two dominant ones. Other democracies around the world are relatively "new" democracies, and so in multiple parties exists in their immaturity.
__________________
We must become the change we want to see.
ebe9 is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2007, 08:05 PM   #7 (permalink)

Purple Belt
 
AlphaQup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,037
Status: AlphaQup is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by ebe9 View Post
Well there were a few other parties back in the day (Whigs, Federalists along with democrats and republicans) but they eventually died out or integrated with the two dominant ones. Other democracies around the world are relatively "new" democracies, and so in multiple parties exists in their immaturity.
If this were true, then Democracies in other countries would eventually evolve into a two party system, but this is not going to be the case.
__________________
[QUOTE=IxiaN;17052853]hero, lol. more like puppet[/QUOTE]
AlphaQup is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2007, 08:08 PM   #8 (permalink)

Blue Belt
 
ebe9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Leocadia
Posts: 882
Status: ebe9 is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlphaQup View Post
If this were true, then Democracies in other countries would eventually evolve into a two party system, but this is not going to be the case.
Well hey, not everyone shares the same views as politicians in America. Who knows what direction these new democracies will head in. I doubt many of them will even last as long as the US anyway.
__________________
We must become the change we want to see.
ebe9 is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2007, 08:17 PM   #9 (permalink)

Blue Belt
 
ebe9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Leocadia
Posts: 882
Status: ebe9 is offline
I honestly predict a few socialists movements in these new democracies (third world). Capitalism and globalization are strong forces but it won't stop a mob of the exploited labor force from over-throwing your ass haha.
__________________
We must become the change we want to see.
ebe9 is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2007, 08:36 PM   #10 (permalink)

Purple Belt
 
AlphaQup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,037
Status: AlphaQup is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by ebe9 View Post
Well hey, not everyone shares the same views as politicians in America. Who knows what direction these new democracies will head in. I doubt many of them will even last as long as the US anyway.
...this is my understanding...

Here in the United States you have two choices, Republican or Democrat. The problem with this is if your #1 political interest is small Government (Republican), than you are implicitly supporting the Christian-right (Republican), a strong military (Republican), a less environment friendly emphasis (Republican), pro-life (Republican) and isolationism (Republican) whether you like it or not. This is why it seems so backwards to non-Americans looking into the United States' two party system.

In non-US democracies each one of these political interests would represent their own independent political party. When elections are held for seats in Parliament (aka Congress), there is almost never a majority. What these Democracies do after the elections is they have to form a coalition; or in other words assemble alliances with other parties to make a majority [coalition].

For instance, lets say there are a 100 Parliament seats and the following political parties won (said) number of seats:

Small Government Party (26)
Socialist Government Party (16)
Pro-Choice Party (15)
Pro-Life Party (8)
Environment Friendly Party (10)
Big Business Party (6)
Athiest Party (9)
Pro-Christian Party (3)
Globalization Friendly Party (5)
Isolationism Party (2)

Basically the Small Government Party (Republican view in the United States), the Pro-Choice Party (Democratic view in the United States) and the Environment Friendly Party (Democratic view in the United States) could form a coalition with their 51 seats and hold a majority.

If we use the above numbers in the Unite States model, the Democrats would have won the election and the following political views would be (politically) embraced:

Socialist Government, Pro-Choice, Environment Friendly, Atheist (or non religous) and Globalization (strong foriegn policy) platforms.

I could go on and on and most likely be corrected even more, but conceptually I hope to have painted a good generalization of the differences.
__________________
[QUOTE=IxiaN;17052853]hero, lol. more like puppet[/QUOTE]
AlphaQup is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote

Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Where is the Shaolin Kempo in MMA? Evan_the_kid The Wasteland 54 12-11-2007 12:51 AM
fighters inc party this saturday! fighters inc The Heavyweights: UFC and WEC 0 09-05-2007 08:18 AM
"Good Riddance, Attention Whore" ...by Cindy Sheehan EDBM The War Room 47 05-29-2007 07:07 PM
My take on reparations. LozanoJ1985 The War Room 98 05-31-2006 05:34 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin Version {1. Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2008 Sherdog.com | Privacy Policy | Click here to advertise on Sherdog