[DC01]

Originally Posted by Dizzle

The mainstream liberal media will never give ron paul a fair chance because people will be too scared to vote for a "radical" unless the media will endorse that candate(Obama)

No one other than elites will have the funds to run for office if you ban private donations.

" fidel castro, che guevara, hugo chavez, robert mugabe" these leaders are murderous tryants and don't belong in the same catagory as ron paul/buchanan

publicly funded means tax payers pay for elections. that means anyone who has the credentials to run for office will have everything paid by the citizens and not by corporations. when corporations fund campaigns, the politicians get into office and serve corporations at the expense of the people.

castro, che guevara, hugo chavez, and robert mugabe are no different then the founding fathers of america and are from the exact same cloth as ron paul. like i said, you'll look down on those who took their country back. america was all in favor of the previous dictator batista because he served corporate interests in cuba.

the mainstream media isn't liberal. they're corporate. mtv makes donations to both the republican and democratic party every election. not to mention they're owned by viacom which is a major conglomerate. the same "liberal media" that won't cover any of the real issues...the same liberal media that discredited ron paul, who is almost more liberal than both democrats that are running.

[brackis1]

You're both misled. Far right and far left policies are ridiculous and result in people killing each other rather than being economically productive.

[Untermensch202]

Originally Posted by SlowlyWeRot

Stupid, rich white people are selling us out. They always have fucked over the average white person as much as they could for all of history. It was only 200 years ago when the vast majority of Europeans lived in hunger and poverty, and a few rich assholes controlled everyone. Not much difference now, except it's the government that we elect fucking us over. Especially in Europe. Virtually no non-white country in the world would ever allow so many immigrants to form in their country. And for good reason, as it creates conflict and ends up shrinking the indigenous population of that country.

But the fact is, a good number of average white people are pretty stupid themselves and allow themselves to be bred out. No one even gives a shit about the MASSIVE immigration problem in the US, and the few that do are labelled racists and pretty much ignored. What kind of country doesn't even have a fence along a massive border, allowing hordes of illegal immigrants to cross over freely, plus lots of drugs, weapons, etc? Completely idiotic.

Needless to say, white people a hundred years ago (and all throughout the rest of history) wouldn't have stood for such bullshit. Modern society has tons of flaws that no one bothers changing, even though the fake politicians claim they change things. Mass immigration, unchallenged by the people of the nation, ended up being a major reason for the disintegration of Rome, and most likely the exact same thing will happen in the US.

The majority of white people in North America belong to a shallow, uncaring, superficial culture that makes lives essentially meaningless and devoid of importance. That site "Stuff White People Like" really is true when it comes to the average liberal white person in North America. They don't care about anything other than themselves, follow trends en cue, have very little knowledge of true politics, and completely ignore problems in their country due to their currently sheltered lives. They are not the same kind of white people that sent millions of men to fight the evil of Hitler in Europe, nor are they the same kind of white people who were responsible for importance events like the Renaissance, the empires of Rome and Greece, etc. They are weaker, dumber, and have no cultural goals other than to be part of trends and make money. I am ashamed that white people are so careless and moronic these days.

I now have a newfound respect for Canada. Right on brother. My favorite part of all this is how so many people, including whites, act as if it's not even a legitimate opinion to advocate an end to immigration. I've heard smart people argue that anyone who wants to go somewhere should be able to go somewhere. If that were the accepted rule, countries like China could literally send enough people abroad that Beijing dictated the actions of all of Europe and North America.

[ErikHS]

Originally Posted by Bill Baker

good call (along with comprehensive sex ed.)

this needs to be done so the devloping countries' population dosnt outgrow their economies and infrastructure

This wouldnt happen if the west wasnt feeding them, in a way its un-natural and wrong. But we have so much bad concience for (continuing) exploting them, that we wont stop the handouts.

[technomance]

Originally Posted by farrellesque

Why don't you just come out and say it?

Have some fucking balls. You leave little hints of it everywhere, in your posts, in your custom text etc. Just say it, it'll feel like a burden lifting of your shoulders. You obviously really hate white people and it's not healthy to keep it inside.

[Col NeedRay]

The sad thing is that its white people selling this country out.

*BUZZ* Sorry that is Incorrect!!!

[JerkWeed]

Mass immigration caused some considerable problems for the original inhabitants in my country.

As people continue to intermarry maybe we can get to the point where we are all one tan colour and just drop the whole "race" thing altogether.

[Jay Pan ROKK]

Originally Posted by Mr Payne

The US will be like South America soon enough. Poor brownies ruled by a white elite minority.

I feel the other way around, I will be glad when south america be like USA or EU, economically i mean.

Many parts of the world are growing a middle class, participating more and more of the global market.

[Jay Pan ROKK]

Salaries in China and India will grow with time also, they can not keep low prices of prodcts forever.

[Dizzle]

Originally Posted by DC01

publicly funded means tax payers pay for elections. that means anyone who has the credentials to run for office will have everything paid by the citizens and not by corporations. when corporations fund campaigns, the politicians get into office and serve corporations at the expense of the people.

castro, che guevara, hugo chavez, and robert mugabe are no different then the founding fathers of america and are from the exact same cloth as ron paul. like i said, you'll look down on those who took their country back. america was all in favor of the previous dictator batista because he served corporate interests in cuba.

the mainstream media isn't liberal. they're corporate. mtv makes donations to both the republican and democratic party every election. not to mention they're owned by viacom which is a major conglomerate. the same "liberal media" that won't cover any of the real issues...the same liberal media that discredited ron paul, who is almost more liberal than both democrats that are running.

Not "credentials", its based on a previous showing in a election or sometimes straw polls, I was not refering to corp donations but by private individual donations.

Ron Paul is Far from liberal, hes more of a libertarian. Theres no way the mainstreammedia could support corporate interest and endorse a socalist Obama