CNBC - Dollar Will be Utterly Destroyed, Global Currency, New World Order

[meta0747]

[DepthchargeZero]

oh god...F that..

[ohflow]

Meta makes me happy, he always gives me a reason to laugh with every single one of his conspiracy threads.

[redjako]

They are slowly becoming Faux newsish.

Bloomberg, save us.

[Mordecai]

I'll bite, Meta.

Your constant stream of CT threads you are obviously trying to get across a certain point. What is it? What role do you want to play if this ideology of yours is correct?

Do you want to be know as a prophet? Maybe a leader? Perhaps a new age visionary? (ie Alex Jones, David Icke) What do you want us ear-muffed, blind-folded, sheep to do? What is your intentions is all I ask.

[dylanransom]

There will be a global currency eventually (the dollar has nearly been one for a long time), and we already have a global government (UN) that is struggling for legitimacy and power. The difference between rationality and conspiracy is understanding how these things work in real life.

The New World Order is plenty real enough, and there is a struggle for who is going to have the power. The world is coming together by a natural process in human evolution, no matter which dudes are conspiring with which dudes. Read the CFR hot shots. Read the people associated with Bilderberg meetings. Read the foreign policy experts from the most powerful military and economic nations. It's a little hard to find when you start out, but you can verify or put into proper context anything guys like Alex Jones put out there.

[Position]

This isn't CNBC talking, this is someone who appeared on CNBC off hours and stating his own opinion. There are hundreds that do that every week on the same channel and often oppose each other.

Not saying the Dollar isn't in trouble but for this guy to say that we only export promises is stupid. The trade gap actually has shrunk last time I checked and most of things we import from overseas are produced by American companies that uses offshore cheap labor.

[SleepyBoy]

Originally Posted by dylanransom

There will be a global currency eventually (the dollar has nearly been one for a long time), and we already have a global government (UN) that is struggling for legitimacy and power. The difference between rationality and conspiracy is understanding how these things work in real life.

The New World Order is plenty real enough, and there is a struggle for who is going to have the power. The world is coming together by a natural process in human evolution, no matter which dudes are conspiring with which dudes. Read the CFR hot shots. Read the people associated with Bilderberg meetings. Read the foreign policy experts from the most powerful military and economic nations. It's a little hard to find when you start out, but you can verify or put into proper context anything guys like Alex Jones put out there.

exactly.
Trying to deny the new world order is silly, when the pushers of a new world order openly declare the need for one. the debate should be what exactly is the nwo and how will it be applied.

Gordon Brown, Al Gore, H. Kissenger, ZBryz, Obama, Soros, Murdoc, The Financial Times, ...etc all call for a new world order.

I mean are we to pretend that they never said these things?

[DropBows]

LMAO. It sounds like he just bought a bunch of gold and wants to inflate it's price by scaring people into hoarding gold in fear of a U.S. dollar collapse. LOL. It really sounds like a 4 am infomercial that tries to look like a news broadcast.

[dylanransom]

Originally Posted by SleepyBoy

exactly.
Trying to deny the new world order is silly, when the pushers of a new world order openly declare the need for one. the debate should be what exactly is the nwo and how will it be applied.

Gordon Brown, Al Gore, H. Kissenger, ZBryz, Obama, Soros, Murdoc, The Financial Times, ...etc all call for a new world order.

I mean are we to pretend that they never said these things?

Judging from their openness, we are supposed to accept it and be marginalized for our skepticism of their goals and their techniques to achieve those goals. What we have going for us is that generally elites cannot agree on the details. What they do agree on is a centralized world bank and a small amount of sovereignty within a world government structure of laws. They don't agree on what should stay sovereign, they don't agree on how to best socialize services, they don't agree on how much influence and power corporations should have, or banks should have. They don't agree on individual rights and to what degree a person is the property of the state. They don't agree on the circumstances for use of military force. In most of these issues, America is actually on the 'good' side of civil rights.

It cannot be ignored that America tells the UN to go fuck itself on a regular basis. I don't usually agree with the things we "object" to, but I won't allow myself to believe it's all a big show. The same people who are open about a new world order also constantly in diplomatic negotiations and conflicts. It's too big a show to be staged.