[bustr]

http://www.patriotcalendar.com:80/pa...wnload/gid,67/

[gza]

yes we know it was an inside job there was bombs inside everyone heard it bush did it for oil blah blahigejifj lbah blah blahb ahlbha shut up

[bustr]

You shut up.

[Lubanlong]

OMFG Absolutely mind blowing!!!!!!!!!!!

[Pillow]

Does anyone still care at this point?

[flatline]

well, recently another demolitions expert went on record about the collapse as being impossible to link to fire. who cares though.

[Flexwave2003]

Speaking of 9/11, here is a video of a man that is challenging the NIST report(gasp, what a surprise huh?).
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...arch&plindex=4

[Gregster]

Originally Posted by bustr

http://www.patriotcalendar.com:80/pa...wnload/gid,67/

bustr....I think this is bound to spark controversy. I hope you know what you're doing, bro.

Originally Posted by flatline

well, recently another demolitions expert went on record about the collapse as being impossible to link to fire. who cares though.

You certainly don't, since you couldn't be bothered to source this mind-blowing bit of news. "Another" demolitions expert? In addition to Danny Jowenko, or is he being counted twice?

I can't help but notice that your determination to continue to myopically focus on fire as being the entire cause of the collapse and then sarcastically mock this explanation as though anyone-- *ANYONE*-- with a shred of credibility who advocates the official (read: actual, non-batshit-crazy) explanation for the WTC collapse is actually making such a claim remains as strong and unwavering as ever, just as your relentless dedication to ignoring other possible factors of causation like...oh, I dunno...the 200-ton exploding objects that rammed the buldings at 500 miles an hour? Yeah, I guess there's no point in bring *THAT* tired, lame old bit of trivia up again either. Not when your dedication to seeking the truth remains untainted by a surplus of actual facts or the willingness to acknowledge them.

[Gregster]

Originally Posted by Flexwave2003

Speaking of 9/11, here is a video of a man that is challenging the NIST report(gasp, what a surprise huh?).
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...arch&plindex=4

Yeah. As always, mind-blowing stuff that's just too compelling to look away from.

Example: at 1 minute, 7 seconds in, Mr. Ryan lays bare his rock-solid credentials for examining the WTC collapse: he's a former manager of UL's Water Testing Division, and by his own admission, "I'm not an engineer...I'm a chemist." Wow! Another non-expert giving his uninformed opinions! A PhD in Theology, a physicist who discusses ****llurgy, and now a water-testing expert! With a battery of experts like this, how can anyone still be dumb enough to believe the willd, hare-brained musings of hundreds of certified experts in engineering, forensics, fire control, and architecture?

Not surprising with that kind of cred that he felt qualified to tell his bosses at UL that he refused to accept the claim that-- are you all sitting down? 'Cuz this is some crazy shit here!-- Ryan refused to believe that FIRE MELTED THE STEEL!!!

Well....NIST has also explained about as well as any collection of thousands of actual experts engaged in exhaustive analsys that the "melted steel" theory is nonsense, or at least not up to actual academically-disciplined rigor. Which would mean that Mr. Ryan is apparently part of some new wing of the "9-11 Truth Movement" dedicated to exposing lies put forth by the government by demonstrating how it's impossible...for the stuff they do not claim happened....happened...uhhh...what the fuck?

Sounds like a double-bluff! I think Ryan's in on it!!!

[Flexwave2003]

Originally Posted by Gregster

Not surprising with that kind of cred that he felt qualified to tell his bosses at UL that he refused to accept the claim that-- are you all sitting down? 'Cuz this is some crazy shit here!--

haha!!