| The War Room Gun-toting neocon? Tree-hugging lib? Duke it out in the War Room. |
 |
|
04-01-2008, 01:15 PM
|
#41 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,798
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by enginekid
too many cops think like you bulldog. anyone with half a brain who reads your posts can see how misinformed you are. and its obvious no dosage of intelligence injected into your psyche is strong enough to cure your hatred for the truth. its people like you who raise kids in trailers, and bring them up to believe a bunch of low-brow bullshit, thats put america on the downhill slide. turn off the computer, i think jerry springer is on, you dont want to miss your favorite show do ya?
|
AH!!! Engineked!!! I was wondering when our local young, naive college kid would jump in on this thread!!
And once again, you resort to attacking me personally and making insulting assumptions about the type of people who do my job rather than.....actually debating my points with a counter-argument.
So, since you say I have a "hatred for the truth", then please, with all your college student wisdom, inform this 15 year metro police veteran of "the truth" of what would happen if every cop and soldier layed down their guns tomorrow and said "F it, I quit". No cops. No soldiers for martial law. What happens Please, your professors have obviously enlightened you about these topics far more in your classroom than I could ever learn from 15 years on the street, so HELP me learn the truth.
|
|
|
04-01-2008, 01:20 PM
|
#42 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 445
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by enginekid
too many cops think like you bulldog. anyone with half a brain who reads your posts can see how misinformed you are. and its obvious no dosage of intelligence injected into your psyche is strong enough to cure your hatred for the truth. its people like you who raise kids in trailers, and bring them up to believe a bunch of low-brow bullshit, thats put america on the downhill slide. turn off the computer, i think jerry springer is on, you dont want to miss your favorite show do ya?
|
So, you're just going to call him stupid?
Great post...
Both sides of the argument are stupid. We won't go into a complete state of chaos, and we won't have a lack of change in crime. Crime will go up, that is obvious.
|
|
|
04-01-2008, 01:23 PM
|
#43 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,798
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pillbox Joe
Here is how it works right now.. the smart deviants in society become cops, the dumb deviants in society become criminals. The rich have figured out a way to split up the deviants of society and cancel them out. The people who are truly holding society together are not the cops, but the rich.
|
I heard the following example from an old Army Sgt, talking about soldiers and cops:
"There are three types of people in this country. Wolves, dogs and sheep. Wolves are violent, nasty creatures. They care about nothing but their own survival and pleasure. They will kill, eat or injure anything they can so long as they survive it and enjoy it. The wolf loves violence in any fashion. The sheep is the opposite of the wolf. The sheep is fat and soft. The sheep despises violence of any kind. The sheep is a bit arrogant and sees itself as morally and intellectually superior through it's condemnation of violence. Then, there is the dog. Much like the wolf, the dog enjoys some level of violence. But the dog has a conscience, and thus, could not be violent towards a sheep, but only a wolf. The dog lives for the day the wolf comes for the sheep. The dog is disgusted by both the wolf and the sheep, but for some reason, is willing to die fighting the wolf to protect the sheep. When there is no wolf, the dog and sheep don't get along. The sheep doesn't like the dog because it knows the dog reminds them that the wolf is out there somewhere. The sheep doesn't like to even accept that the wolf exists, and especially doesn't like thinking it needs the dog because it is too weak to fight the wolf. The only constant is that the sheep hates both the dog and the wolf."
Some people are wolves. Some are sheep. And some are dogs.
|
|
|
04-01-2008, 01:26 PM
|
#44 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,798
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean O Deere
So, you're just going to call him stupid?
Great post...
Both sides of the argument are stupid. We won't go into a complete state of chaos, and we won't have a lack of change in crime. Crime will go up, that is obvious.
|
He's just a young college kid who hasn't hit the real world yet. My post was a bit hyped, a bit sarcastic, but was just a response to the severe cop hating on another thread. If all our cops quit tomorrow, I think the first few weeks would be OK because of the shock factor. Americans wouldn't quite know what to do different, if anything. But, once the criminals, the greedy and the desperate realized it was safe to act however one wanted- it would absolutely IMO cause a chaotic society. Money would be useless as theft would no longer be punished.
Basically, a copless society would depend on the good faith of humanity to keep the peace among itself. Look at examples throughout history and current events where a population has no police. Where did peace ensue?
|
|
|
04-01-2008, 01:26 PM
|
#45 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mars
Posts: 5,427
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bulldogs85
I heard the following example from an old Army Sgt, talking about soldiers and cops:
"There are three types of people in this country. Wolves, dogs and sheep. Wolves are violent, nasty creatures. They care about nothing but their own survival and pleasure. They will kill, eat or injure anything they can so long as they survive it and enjoy it. The wolf loves violence in any fashion. The sheep is the opposite of the wolf. The sheep is fat and soft. The sheep despises violence of any kind. The sheep is a bit arrogant and sees itself as morally and intellectually superior through it's condemnation of violence. Then, there is the dog. Much like the wolf, the dog enjoys some level of violence. But the dog has a conscience, and thus, could not be violent towards a sheep, but only a wolf. The dog lives for the day the wolf comes for the sheep. The dog is disgusted by both the wolf and the sheep, but for some reason, is willing to die fighting the wolf to protect the sheep. When there is no wolf, the dog and sheep don't get along. The sheep doesn't like the dog because it knows the dog reminds them that the wolf is out there somewhere. The sheep doesn't like to even accept that the wolf exists, and especially doesn't like thinking it needs the dog because it is too weak to fight the wolf. The only constant is that the sheep hates both the dog and the wolf."
Some people are wolves. Some are sheep. And some are dogs.
|
I think perhaps people are too diverse to be classified like this. Perhaps their upbringing is what brings criminals to violence, or biological or chemical problems, but it is the desire for action and violence that brings cops and criminals to relate to each other in my opinion. They are simply fighting for different things, but to the same effect, ultimately, self gratification. Wether they gratify themselves through "fighting bad guys" or "fighting good guys", it will ultimately be for themselves, but because they are so self righteous, they wont realize it.
Perhaps the true "dogs" in your analogy are the doctors, nurses, firefighters, the people who actually do live to help others and not to gratify their own needs.
|
|
|
04-01-2008, 01:30 PM
|
#46 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,798
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pillbox Joe
I think perhaps people are too diverse to be classified like this. Perhaps their upbringing is what brings criminals to violence, or biological or chemical problems, but it is the desire for action and violence that brings cops and criminals to relate to each other in my opinion. They are simply fighting for different things, but to the same effect, ultimately, self gratification. Wether they gratify themselves through "fighting bad guys" or "fighting good guys", it will ultimately be for themselves, but because they are so self righteous, they wont realize it.
|
Thats a damn good point. Agree completely. A cop must be a bit "off" to put on a vest, gun, badge, go into bad neighborhoods almost always alone, with backup nearby though, and enforce laws on strangers who are often armed and desperate, work insane hours, and be bitten, stabbed, pissed on, have people shit in the car, puke in it, shoot at us and be despised by a significant % of soceity.....and all for a starting salary of 30-45K. And to keep doing it out of "duty".
In that example, you are right. The wolf and dog are more closely related than either to the sheep. Which is why a sheep hates the dog, but needs him to survive.
|
|
|
04-01-2008, 01:30 PM
|
#47 (permalink)
|
Purple Belt
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,466
|
haha. this was dumb. although i agree with what you said, it wont happen. this is sherdog, a site for MIXED MARTIAL ARTS. sorry kid, you shold go post on another site that cares.
__________________
Chuck
Gsp
Huerta
Wand
Penn
Lesnar
Fedor
Griffen
Jardine
Arlovski
|
|
|
04-01-2008, 01:30 PM
|
#48 (permalink)
|
|
And It's Gone!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,724
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by muerteverde
We don't need to imagine a country without police, we can just look at one of the countries that already exists without effective police control. Iraq, Afghanistan, Haiti a few years ago and several African nations come ot mind right away. Those are not places I would want to live.
|
Actually, those are dirt poor countries without police. As well-populated countries become poorer, you see an increase in violence.
What the hell is the point of this thread? There are a lot of jobs that our society needs to function effectively. What if all doctors quit? What if all farmers quit? This can go on and on.
But that doesn't mean people can't dislike the police. Of course not. There are people that don't like doctors, dentists, lawyers, etc. but they understand that, at some level, those jobs are necessary for a modern, well-functioning society.
__________________
"I thought the stimulus was worse then 9/11." - Dysentery
|
|
|
04-01-2008, 01:32 PM
|
#49 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mars
Posts: 5,427
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bulldogs85
Thats a damn good point. Agree completely. A cop must be a bit "off" to put on a vest, gun, badge, go into bad neighborhoods almost always alone, with backup nearby though, and enforce laws on strangers who are often armed and desperate, work insane hours, and be bitten, stabbed, pissed on, have people shit in the car, puke in it, shoot at us and be despised by a significant % of soceity.....and all for a starting salary of 30-45K. And to keep doing it out of "duty".
In that example, you are right. The wolf and dog are more closely related than either to the sheep. Which is why a sheep hates the dog, but needs him to survive.
|
But another problem is that even a "sheep" or a non violent non criminal person can be driven to violence and to defend himself if necessary. This is why everyone didn't kill each other off before modern society. People aren't so defenseless as you make them sound.
|
|
|
04-01-2008, 01:33 PM
|
#50 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,798
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GermanBJJ
Actually, those are dirt poor countries without police. As well-populated countries become poorer, you see an increase in violence.
What the hell is the point of this thread? There are a lot of jobs that our society needs to function effectively. What if all doctors quit? What if all farmers quit? This can go on and on.
But that doesn't mean people can't dislike the police. Of course not. There are people that don't like doctors, dentists, lawyers, etc. but they understand that, at some level, those jobs are necessary for a modern, well-functioning society.
|
Imagine if those dirt poor countries also had neighborhoods of extreme wealth and a culture of greed and selfishness instead of survival. Like America does. Think those middle class and wealthy would become targets of the dirt poor and desperate? Of course. Think some of the greedy people who were already middle class or wealthy would take advantage of a no-consequence society and get more material or sexual gratification through force and survival of the fittest? I'd bet they would.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|