|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
05-08-2008, 05:08 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
Orange Belt
Status:
|
|
Sports Websites hating on Boxing?
This does no include ESPN.COM btw. They kept their Boxing page and while a few newstories have the inevitable "Boxing vs. MMA dabte" (and its died down on ESPN.COM really) they truly kept their Boxing page.
But,
Foxsports.com, SI.com, Yahoo.com, aolsports, ect... have added MMA along side Boxing and usually 90% of their stories are MMA related. Boxing stories are sometimes very negative towards the sport as well. Others like MSN sports just have a UFC section and maybe a Boxing story or two will be added along side it. Some have totally isolated Boxing and kicked it to the curb just like that (Basically)
I have nothing against MMA. I watch the sport. I do enjoy it. While I lean towards Boxing my self I feel this is a slap in the face to Boxing though. Especially all the big news stories Boxing has given sports over the years. Just like that they stab it on the back.
I cant believe they dont realize 3 key things. (there are prob more key things but these are the main ones.
1. Alot if not some of Boxing fans dont care for MMA
2. Alot of MMA if not some fans dont care for Boxing
3. They are not, in any way-shape-or-form the same sport. (Sure the concept is the same... but come on)
Sports Illustrated has had alot of their issues sold because of Boxing in the past and they've just anihilated Boxing and seem to be on a mission to force an extermination of the sport of Boxing from their mag. (Althought the Spanish version which my uncle always gets has alot of Boxing stories) . (The Ring issue I have actually briefly talks about Sports Illustrated and how they've declaired Boxing dead and MMA in btw)
What pisses me off the more is that Boxing had a very good 2006 year, An Even better 2007 year and is currently following that pattern with 2008. I can understand any argument (while I disagree) that more casual fans are watching "UFC" than Boxing but IFL? King of the Cage? Elite XC? Dream? These small orgs get more coverage than boxing yet alot of them are losing money. Tell me any MMA org besides UFC that can sell 250,000 PPV buys. Chavez jr. sells more PPV's than all MMA orgs except for UFC.(Although that kid needs to stop fighitng on overpriced PPV's against journey men)
The numbers for Boxing are very similar to UFC. (And costs more $ at that-Nothing to brag about of course, I hate paying for PPV) Boxing is breaking records as well. Mayweather/Hatton broke record for non Heavyweight/Non latino PPV. Pac vs. Marquez for any weight class under 140.
I would just be interested to know why they have to remove Boxing yet some of those websites keep Bowling, Poker and AFL Football in their respective slots/pages.
|
| |
|
05-08-2008, 05:12 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Purple Belt
| Location:
Searching for the American Dream..... |
Status:
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragonstyle915
This does no include ESPN.COM btw. They kept their Boxing page and while a few newstories have the inevitable "Boxing vs. MMA dabte" (and its died down on ESPN.COM really) they truly kept their Boxing page.
But,
Foxsports.com, SI.com, Yahoo.com, aolsports, ect... have added MMA along side Boxing and usually 90% of their stories are MMA related. Boxing stories are sometimes very negative towards the sport as well. Others like MSN sports just have a UFC section and maybe a Boxing story or two will be added along side it. Some have totally isolated Boxing and kicked it to the curb just like that (Basically)
I have nothing against MMA. I watch the sport. I do enjoy it. While I lean towards Boxing my self I feel this is a slap in the face to Boxing though. Especially all the big news stories Boxing has given sports over the years. Just like that they stab it on the back.
I cant believe they dont realize 3 key things. (there are prob more key things but these are the main ones.
1. Alot if not some of Boxing fans dont care for MMA
2. Alot of MMA if not some fans dont care for Boxing
3. They are not, in any way-shape-or-form the same sport. (Sure the concept is the same... but come on)
Sports Illustrated has had alot of their issues sold because of Boxing in the past and they've just anihilated Boxing and seem to be on a mission to force an extermination of the sport of Boxing from their mag. (Althought the Spanish version which my uncle always gets has alot of Boxing stories) . (The Ring issue I have actually briefly talks about Sports Illustrated and how they've declaired Boxing dead and MMA in btw)
What pisses me off the more is that Boxing had a very good 2006 year, An Even better 2007 year and is currently following that pattern with 2008. I can understand any argument (while I disagree) that more casual fans are watching "UFC" than Boxing but IFL? King of the Cage? Elite XC? Dream? These small orgs get more coverage than boxing yet alot of them are losing money. Tell me any MMA org besides UFC that can sell 250,000 PPV buys. Chavez jr. sells more PPV's than all MMA orgs except for UFC.(Although that kid needs to stop fighitng on overpriced PPV's against journey men)
The numbers for Boxing are very similar to UFC. (And costs more $ at that-Nothing to brag about of course, I hate paying for PPV) Boxing is breaking records as well. Mayweather/Hatton broke record for non Heavyweight/Non latino PPV. Pac vs. Marquez for any weight class under 140.
I would just be interested to know why they have to remove Boxing yet some of those websites keep Bowling, Poker and AFL Football in their respective slots/pages.
|
I agree that it's sad that boxing coverage by the mainstream media has declined. I think there's room enough for boxing and MMA to co-exist, but it seems like the mainstream media wants to cover one at the expense of the other.
__________________
"That'll make your back crack, your liver quiver and your knees freeze."
- Dusty Rhodes
|
| |
|
05-08-2008, 05:23 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Orange Belt
Status:
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMyersDTN
I agree that it's sad that boxing coverage by the mainstream media has declined. I think there's room enough for boxing and MMA to co-exist, but it seems like the mainstream media wants to cover one at the expense of the other.
|
I agree. But look at ESPN. They're the leader in sports and they didnt isolate either of them and created their seperate web pages for them.
I know MMA has to get more "hits" than boxing tho which can be a reaso why. Some of these MMA fans will have a whole discussion on "Did you see him not check if so-n-so was okay? Thats not sporstmanship".... or "So-n-so eats everymorning at exactly 7:13 am. I have source!"
But I still think its pathetic.
|
| |
|
05-08-2008, 05:25 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Blue Belt
Status:
|
|
Check out ESPNs navi bar at the top of their page. Boxing is listed next to the more "popular" sports, where as MMA is in the "other" sports section.
Edit" My bad, should have read the first line of your thread lol. Just read the title and started replying.
Last edited by Sickening Thudd : 05-08-2008 at 05:31 PM.
|
| |
|
05-08-2008, 05:28 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Brown Belt
| Location:
-27.62879, -144.334946 |
Status:
|
|
Sounds like they are just lumping all the combat sports together. I'm not sure I would cry conspiracy though.
__________________
What do monkeys have to do with war, oppression, crime, racism and even e-mail spam? You'll find out here:
http://www.cracked.com/article_14990_what-monkeysphere.html
|
| |
|
05-08-2008, 07:04 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Orange Belt
Status:
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Valiss
Sounds like they are just lumping all the combat sports together. I'm not sure I would cry conspiracy though.
|
Its not a Conspiracy. Not even that. It's a blatant assault on Boxing. Sports websites like Foxsports, MSN and SI dont hide it.
MLB baseball and Hockey dont get ratings like they used to. I dont see the MLBpage on those websites being shared with Softball. And dont see Hockey merged wiht Soccer since they both are sports that consist of making goals.
|
| |
|
05-08-2008, 09:54 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Blue Belt
Status:
|
|
Blame boxing. For years they put on fights no one wanted to see and charged prices no one could afford. It is getting better and in the last 18 months or so we have seen some truly great fighters with big names fight each other. If that keeps up, look for boxing to make a come back but for every Mosley-Cotto, Calzghe-hopkins we have Ten DLH-Forbes or john ruiz fights.
__________________
Fighting revisionist history one ignorant post at a time
http://members.shaw.ca/tmanifold
Training Blog: http://tonyssubmissions.blogspot.com/
|
| |
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:30 AM.
|