[PrettyBoyOscar]

Hope you guys enjoy these:

Part 1 : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9D15TVkguc
Part 2 : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z8GAwkgkMTU
Part 3 : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUqwjZ_0TzI

[dans_fedor]

Originally Posted by PrettyBoyOscar

Hope you guys enjoy these:

Part 1 : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9D15TVkguc
Part 2 : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z8GAwkgkMTU
Part 3 : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUqwjZ_0TzI

thanx a lot oscar!! i was searching and searching and searching but i coulndt find them,does the countdown's always go out one week prior to the fight?

[JMyersDTN]

I feel like it's Pavlik's to lose because he was the one who took the fight seriously from the beginning and Taylor has had to "rededicate himself" to things to get ready for Pavlik, which to me means that he didn't think Pavlik was a threat the first time.

[dans_fedor]

i guess the ghots will beat him again

[Nasty86]

Originally Posted by DKNKMK

I believe many boxing fans don't like him for some of the wins he's recieved that they felt he didn't deserve like his fight with Cory Spinks, or his draw with Wright. You could even make an argument about his 2 wins over Hopkins. I personally thought he deserved the decisions over Hopkins, but they were very close fights & I can understand if some think they could've gone the other way. To add to that, a lot of fans & critics believe that you should beat a champion more decisively, especially one as dominant as Hopkins was, to take the title.

Cool, that's no reason not to like him though. It's not his fault the judges ruled those matches in his favor, he's a boxer, not a judge.

[dengar]

Originally Posted by DaRuckus337

Why on earth would anyone hope that? Both good fighters, both good guys, but JT doesn't put on entertaining fights, Pavlik does. I'm rooting for the guy who will continue to feed me action fights as champ for the next 5-10 years, and that's Kelly Pavlik.

That is why Pavlik is so easy to like. He brings it every single fight and looks to finish. The fact that he is really down to earth is just icing on the cake.

[Seano]

Originally Posted by GlassJaw

The undercard is absolutely awesome as well

Has somebody already asked who is on the undercard? I don't think I've heard.

[Seano]

Originally Posted by chosen_one

Wow I guess I'm the only one who will pick Taylor. I used to be a fan of his but was glad to see him get ktfo, I think it might stir him up. Either way it will be entertaining cz Pavlik makes it a "fight" everytime.

Nah. I picked Taylor to KO pavlik early in the first fight, which almost came true. He can do it again.

People should be rooting for Taylor. If the second is anything like the first, why not see a third.

[XiaolinSoldier]

Originally Posted by Nasty86

Cool, that's no reason not to like him though. It's not his fault the judges ruled those matches in his favor, he's a boxer, not a judge.

Some of the things he has said were pretty tough to swallow. He was very indignant about it when people mentioned Spinks beating him. He gave a crappy performance and got beat by a WW, when he gets a BS decision his response is "you have to take it from the champ", so did he take it from Hopkins? He lost both of the Hop fights, Wright, and Spinks and but shows no humility.
Pavlik would never show a crappy performance like Taylor did to Spinks, he would always come to fight, and hes much more humble. Ill be glad to be rid of Taylor.

[Seano]

Originally Posted by XiaolinSoldier

"you have to take it from the champ", .

Slightly off topic, but I hate when people say this. How do you decide when the champ has lost enough? If a fighter beats a champ by one point, did he not beat the champ enough?