Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbylight
How does this relate to protein?
Faith and reason are mutually exclusive but through reasoning you could come to the conclusion that there is a God. Debates have been won in favor of God.
But basically what I'm trying to say is that I'm not trying to argue if God exists or does not exist. I am pretty sure he does, but I can't give any theological reasonings for it. I just have my experiences that no one else will understand. But I find it insulting to say anyone that believes in God lacks reason, and I also find it to be wrong. And dysentary or whatever is a troll anyway. white belt from 2005, its quite obvious.
|
No, you can only argue that God is more likely, and even those arguments, ultimately, are pointless.
Arguments that God exists (the Hebrew God model of the Bible, Torah, Koran) are pointless and futile; the very definition of said God is that he transcends the mortal universe; he imbues every cell of it while remaining divinely apart from it.
Don't you understand? Any physical evidence gathered in this universe is mortal- not divine- evidence. It has no bearing on divinity.
However, when there are scientific arguments to suggest a creator, I'm always interested to hear them. The only problem is that you'd be making a ridiculous number of assumptions to believe that any creation we're investigating is the one caused by an all-knowing, all-loving, all-powerful God. There are an infinite number of alternative possibilities.
