[sursh123]

Originally Posted by 6StingHero

So completely dismissing the idea of god is more rational than keeping an open mind to the idea?

Don't mind him, he's a fucking idiot....Who is he to prove god doesn't exist??

Personally, I'm neutral in the whole matter...I won't know until i'm dead..I don't know if god exists or doesn't...No one knows...For all we know there could be infinite dimensions with infinite universes.....

But..it still comes down to the fact that, You cant create something out of pure nothing...Cause and effect can't explain how Life was created..What was the ultimate factor of life's origin?

Big bang? Sure, how did that energy come in the first place?

Seriously, who the fuck knows, the argument will go in circles and circles and circles...No one fucking knows..

It all had to have come from somewhere..something had to have started it all..i dont know..our minds can't comprehend such thoughts..

for now, i'm agnostic.

[Dysentery]

Originally Posted by baatar

wow, that's a lot of faith you have. you sound like the same zealots on late-night Christian channels. different words, same mindset. i.e. i know everything so everyone else is stupid. considering that science bases all its methodologies are based on non-provable premises, science itself is unprovable. so you say that faith in an unprovable method that only find more things it can't explain is more rational that believing we aren't the center of the universe? wow. now you can move on to hope and charity.

You can't defend your claim that I have faith about anything. I also don't know everything and I didn't say I did. The only things I've claimed are:

1. if u believe in god your ability to reason is garbage

2. what a person thinks/believes does not affect how the universe works.

3. should be 100% certain that god does not exist... everything else is ignorant.

How does that add up to me claiming I know everything? it doesn't

"so you say that faith in an unprovable method that only find more things it can't explain is more rational that believing we aren't the center of the universe?"

this makes no sense lol... basically you asked "faith in science is better than believing in science? even though ur description of science is wrong its what u meant.

by this "an unprovable method that only find more things it can't explain" youre referring to science and then

by this "believing we aren't the center of the universe?" is also something that science has proven so try making sense.

I've thoroughly refuted every word of your post so now you can admit that it was stupid ... if you don't then everything you say from now on should be ignored.

[Dysentery]

Originally Posted by sursh123

Don't mind him, he's a fucking idiot....Who is he to prove god doesn't exist??

Did I say I did? Well yeah its simple reasoning but its not only me ... you know that group of people that they call scientists ... yeah its them too and its based on provable discoveries ....

Personally, I'm neutral in the whole matter...I won't know until i'm dead..I don't know if god exists or doesn't...No one knows...For all we know there could be infinite dimensions with infinite universes.....

But..it still comes down to the fact that, You cant create something out of pure nothing...Cause and effect can't explain how Life was created..What was the ultimate factor of life's origin?

Big bang? Sure, how did that energy come in the first place?

Seriously, who the fuck knows, the argument will go in circles and circles and circles...No one fucking knows..

It all had to have come from somewhere..something had to have started it all..i dont know..our minds can't comprehend such thoughts..

for now, i'm agnostic.

blah blah blah so youre asking questions science hasnt solved yet it doesnt mean you cant prove something doesnt exist without knowing absolutely everything about everything.

[baatar]

wow, i guess you are right. science has 100% proven that God does not exist. how could i not have understood that from your eloquent posts? i just didn't realize that science had answered all the questions already. my bad. next we should find a test to test the scientific method.

[baatar]

Originally Posted by Dysentery

it doesnt mean you cant prove something doesnt exist without knowing absolutely everything about everything.

great! share your proof with us so we can duplicate it.

[SlowlyWeRot]

This guy clearly isn't the smartest man in the world because he hasn't made good use of his intelligence to better his life and the world.

[Dysentery]

Originally Posted by baatar

wow, i guess you are right. science has 100% proven that God does not exist. how could i not have understood that from your eloquent posts? i just didn't realize that science had answered all the questions already. my bad. next we should find a test to test the scientific method.

Thankyou for conceding defeat. You can understand it from my eloquent posts by viewing neil degrasse tyson and sam harris on youtube like i told you to. i also didnt claim that science had answered all the questions already but ty for trying. i actually said it doesnt.

[baatar]

sorry everyone. Dysentery is like that fat kid in the back of the class that farts during class. i'm the idiot that turned and laughed. now that he's encouraged we all get to enjoy him stinking up the place more. sorry!

[Dysentery]

Originally Posted by baatar

sorry everyone. Dysentery is like that fat kid in the back of the class that farts during class. i'm the idiot that turned and laughed. now that he's encouraged we all get to enjoy him stinking up the place more. sorry!

Way to refute my argument ***got... I guess thats what you resort to when refuted...

[balance]

Originally Posted by baatar

wow, i guess you are right. science has 100% proven that God does not exist. how could i not have understood that from your eloquent posts? i just didn't realize that science had answered all the questions already. my bad. next we should find a test to test the scientific method.

100% proof that god doesn't exist? LOL. Anyone who has ever taken a course in logic knows that you cannot prove this negative.