[hole in the sky]

Originally Posted by I Shoot Doubles

The chicken came first, duh.

actually the egg came first.


the final product of 'chicken' as we know it would've had to come to its final conclusion in an egg, not the chicken's ancestor. it takes time for a species to adapt by slight genetic variations through its offspring. a non-chicken can't become a chicken in its own lifetime.

[Dom C]

Its all relative to the observer. One person's perspective is different from another's.

[Hagakure]

Maybe the dumbest question I've heard in years. Seriously. Years.

[Hagakure]

Originally Posted by Jerome_1

Good came first, because God is the personification of good.

Evil is the absence of good, just as cold is the absence of heat.

Wow, just wow. I'm terrible at telling whether or not that was sarcasm. But cold as the absence of heat? That just blew my mind. In a bad way.

[hole in the sky]

Originally Posted by Hagakure

Maybe the dumbest question I've heard in years. Seriously. Years.

mindless 'sloganeering' is easy. coming up with a rational rebuttal is not. try to refute what i said with an educated response, otherwise your posts are worthless. absolutely worthless.

[BJJK1]

what came first? stupid questions, or stupid people asking questions?

just messing with you

good and evil is a human construct.

typical bible banger answer regarding good or evil. if you believe in that nonsense, you also should know that god created everything, that includes evil. so yes, when some bad shit happens to you, go ahead and blame it on your imaginary friend up in the sky.

[hole in the sky]

um, that post might be directed towards a theist, but i'm actually atheist. oops! better rethink your argument smart guy, my observations come purely from science and philosophy.

[smasheroffaces]

i asked questions like this when i was 5 ...who made God daddy...doesnt matter....God is and evil is...thats all i need to know

[hole in the sky]

^how can you be so sure god is?

by the way, i guarantee anyone who argues with me on any topic in this thread will lose the argument.

[Jerome_1]

Originally Posted by Hagakure

Wow, just wow. I'm terrible at telling whether or not that was sarcasm. But cold as the absence of heat? That just blew my mind. In a bad way.

That is the definition of cold(The absence of heat)

Cold is the absence of heat. Cold exists only in relative terms, and plays no part in scientific theory. While we all verbalize such expressions as "It is cold out", to be technically correct we should say "the heat level outside is ten degrees farenheit" (which, admittedly, is pretty cold).

Source: http://www.geothermalheatpump.com/how.htm

Originally Posted by Dictionary.com

18. the relative absence of heat: Everyone suffered from the intense cold.

Source: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/cold

Originally Posted by Wikipedia

Cold is the absence of heat, hence in order to decrease a temperature, one "removes heat", rather than "adding cold." In order to satisfy the Second Law of Thermodynamics, some form of work must be performed to accomplish this. This work is traditionally done by mechanical work but can also be done by magnetism, laser or other means. However, all refrigeration uses the three basic methods of heat transfer: convection, conduction, or radiation.

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refrigeration