[cakewalkbaby]

Originally Posted by The Pink Panthe

I really don't see why you demand it to be 'peer reviewed'. It won't change the facts of the matter.

That's the way ALL science is done.

[InSummary]

Originally Posted by The Pink Panthe

Yeah, I know. Reviewed by 'experts' in the field of evolution and related 'sciences'.

yeah, who cares what those silly "scientists" have to say regarding science when we can get the perspective people whom know nothing more than what one of the several ancient books of fiction tell them...


you gotta laugh at yourself for ignoring geologists etc regarding the topic of geology.

[The Pink Panthe]

Originally Posted by cakewalkbaby

That's the way ALL science is done.

So if I get a load of creationists and let them scrutinize over another creationists theories and ideas and they approve it, would that make it peer reviewed?

Because that is the same thing. Evolutionists and old earthers agreeing with other evolutionists and other old earthers.

[InSummary]

Originally Posted by The Pink Panthe

Because that is the same thing. Evolutionists and old earthers agreeing with other evolutionists and other old earthers.

based on evidence.



religion doesnt bother with evidence, which is why there are 1000's of different religions.

[childrenofbodom]

actually you COULD be a creationist OR an evolutionist, but what matters is if you're a geologist..

[InSummary]

Originally Posted by The Pink Panthe

So if I get a load of creationists and let them scrutinize over another creationists theories and ideas and they approve it, would that make it peer reviewed?

and sure you could, but their 'peer reviewed' statements would only matter in terms of interpreting the bible - considering none of them are qualified or properly educated in the realm of science/geology etc.


'peer reviewed' doesnt mean anything if the "peers' dont know what they're talking about in the first place. that would be like getting the opinions of 100 3rd graders regarding medical treatments - it would be 'peer reviewed' and still hilariously inconsequential.

[The Pink Panthe]

Originally Posted by InSummary

and sure you could, but their 'peer reviewed' statements would only matter in terms of interpreting the bible - considering none of them are qualified or properly educated in the realm of science/geology etc.

Yeah sure. No one who believes in creation knows about science. lolski. And for your information,not all creationists believe the Bible either.

'

peer reviewed' doesnt mean anything if the "peers' dont know what they're talking about in the first place. that would be like getting the opinions of 100 3rd graders regarding medical treatments - it would be 'peer reviewed' and still hilariously inconsequential.

Precisely.

[InSummary]

Originally Posted by The Pink Panthe

Precisely.

ergo, creationists opinions on science and geology hold no water.

[The Pink Panthe]

Originally Posted by InSummary

ergo, creationists opinions on science and geology hold no water.

They do with creationists.

[InSummary]

lets not get too far off track here; the topic is this man, who is about to begin being traded for cigarettes because he thought he had 'beaten the tax system.'






remember kids, stay in school - a real school.