Joe Rogan says we didn't land on the moon

godzillad · 02-07-2007, 06:55 PM

http://podcast.penn.freefm.com/penn/174174.mp3

Posting so I have a downloadable link.

mr.bigglesworth · 02-07-2007, 07:20 PM

never thought about it, funny that even 40 years later we havnt been back on the moon. You would think it would be as simple as toasting bread by now. hmmmmm..........

whiteb3lte · 02-07-2007, 07:32 PM

Hehe this is an old theory Fox did a special on it a while back. I do know someone asked Buzz aldrin about it and he KO'd the guy not that long ago.

Things like the waving flag (no wind on the moon) and other things ,supposedly reflections in the helmet is wrong etc....

I know we haven't been back to the moon because the truth is , it is esentially worthless and pointless , they had big dreams of colonizing it but that was so far fetched its not even worth the trouble.

There is literally no reason to go back to the moon other then we "can". There is alot more promise in Europa and Mars and other places.

http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast23feb_2.htm

mr.bigglesworth · 02-07-2007, 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whiteb3lte

Hehe this is an old theory Fox did a special on it a while back. I do know someone asked Buzz aldrin about it and he KO'd the guy not that long ago.

Things like the waving flag (no wind on the moon) and other things ,supposedly reflections in the helmet is wrong etc....

I know we haven't been back to the moon because the truth is , it is esentially worthless and pointless , they had big dreams of colonizing it but that was so far fetched its not even worth the trouble.

There is literally no reason to go back to the moon other then we "can". There is alot more promise in Europa and Mars and other places.

http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast23feb_2.htm

true and it would cost millions to do it again but why not disprove it and show everyone we can do it again. i dont understand exploration f space, they spend millions each year to find out mars had bacteria.

AlphaDelphic · 02-07-2007, 07:56 PM

The evidence for the "moon hoax" is really idiotic once you study it.

Such as "Why cant you see stars in the background!?!?!?!" - this is something common in most photos from outerspace caused by the shutter speed.

CT's are built on stupid shit like that.

whiteb3lte · 02-07-2007, 07:57 PM

Not to mention we supposedly know less about deep sea than space. We still find new species and creatures all the time.

whiteb3lte · 02-07-2007, 08:01 PM

Nasa's funding has been taken away so bad and with so many dissasters because of the lack of funding.

Thats why you see Nasa launch the unmanned vehicles much of them (nuclear powered ).

We are so scared of nuclear power, we could build a Nuclear space shuttle that could go anywhere but don't hold your breath.

Sometimes you have to break a couple eggs to make an omlet sad but true.

RedFox89 · 02-07-2007, 08:08 PM

rogans quite the critic, but he has good evidence so its interesting to see what he has to say.

jahred · 02-07-2007, 08:15 PM

poor joe, it's a shame that he'd fall for this particularly retarded CT.

masato@4nzix · 02-07-2007, 08:22 PM

I AM NOT SUPPORTING THE MOON CT.... but simply wish to bring attention one bit of footage that still kinda sticks out: At the VERY END of the interview Rogan talks about the astronauts looking as if they were supported by wires. Here is the clip in question, at the END:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wdMvQTNLaUE

NOW OF COURSE 90% OF THIS VIDEO LINK IS COMPLETE BS... but the footage at the very END of the clip us undeniable.... Hoax or no hoax... this particular bit of video is very hard to ignore.

I'd like to hear how a de-bunker can explain what is happening in this bit of footage.