[Decommissioner]

Originally Posted by The Hug Dog

I've never seen it, is it worth checking out?

No, but I laughed at the guy who only worked one side of his body. It was hirlarious, his whole gimmick was to use his "good strong" arm to KO some monster.

[M.o.A]

Originally Posted by YeahBee

Will Hunting is a good movie, the Bourne ones to but c'mon brad Pitt has been great in so many awesome movies

12 Monkess, Se7en, True Romance, Legends of the Fall , Sleepers, Joe Black, Fight Club, Snatch, Babel, Jesse James

agree with u on that, pitt has been in the better movies, ( damn i feel so homo typing pitt this many times) but imo damon is the better actor overall.

[YeahBee]

based on waht movies? waht characters?

He is so good in Bourne because he is that robotic in every movie

[JohnnyBuddha]

Originally Posted by YeahBee

based on waht movies? waht characters?

He is so good in Bourne because he is that robotic in every movie

Not that I'm picking sides in this debate, but I thought he was pretty damn good in The Talented Mr. Ripley.

[Soothsayer]

pretty much any of tom cruises earlier films - a bunch of irritating characters, and not one of them died at the end.

****** writters should have been disciplined imo.

[AwwShootBox]

Originally Posted by M.o.A

are you serious? as daniel craig was walking off into the sunset with that girl i thought to myself the plot was amazing and now theyre ruin it with this cliched ending? then the kid popped him and i thought to myself 'perfect'.

Maybe if I had watched Layer Cake before Snatch I would have appreciated the plot a bit more, but ya... I def. agree that the ending was very good, kinda made up for other parts.

And on the topic of Snatch, that movie along with 12 monkeys really made me appreciate Brad Pitt as an actor, most probably point to fight club first, but I really liked him in those movies a bit more I think, for sure he is one of the best when he doesn't choose to go with the 'pop hollywood' movies like troy & Oceans trilogy

[APOLLO]

maybe a bit off topic, but i did not want to start a new thread. Since we are at some good movies with bad endings i stumbled over a statement from uwe boll (the man that makes only bad movies) and laughed my ### off. man the guy is hilarous:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWqCNmfJ1hY

[Salbass]

Originally Posted by JohnnyBuddha

There's that one M. Night Shamalayan movie, Signs, had a bullshit ending if I remember correctly. This girl inexplicably had glasses of water all over the house throughout the movie. Then when the aliens come, water falls on them and they burn! I don't know if that's exactly how it went, but that's how I remember it, and I remember thinking that he reached pretty damn far to find a "clever" ending.

That was so f-ing lame, Shamalama sucks.

[james123]

Originally Posted by Tiger_vs_Mantis

the director himself says there is no answer to the ending. It's supposed to be ambiguous. you just have to live with the uncertainty.

Isn't that just a copout excuse for the filmmaker to be lazy, though? Couldn't a hack director make a movie without bothering to construct a satisfying ending, then chalk up his artistic failure as being the result of his intention to be "ambiguous"?

[Iosephus]

chinatown has one fucked up ending... i dont know if its bad, some people think it is, but talk about depressing