[ihavebignutz]

all time. wandy

right now. rampage.

game to beat any of them during their prime, or right now: chuck.

[MMAPhilippines]

MMAth doesn't work.

Wand has Rampage's number and Rampage has Chuck's. Chuck beat Wand but pending a 2nd win we cannot safely say he has his number. In the end, styles make fights.

[ihavebignutz]

Originally Posted by BiggSlick

I am a fan of all three fighters. No doubt, all of them are great. It is easy for someone to say right now that Rampage is the best because he has the gold. However, he will eventually lose it or possibly retire with it.

Based on what they have accomplished at this point in their careers, I would say Wand is #1Chuck is #2, and Rampage is #3. This order can easily be changed and is based on opinion obviously. It can't really be determined until all of them have retired and we look at their careers in the past tense.

If they all retired today Wand would have held the title the longest. He went unbeaten for 5 years and stopped Rampage twice. Chuck had 3 years where he was untouchable, knocking out every opponent in sight including Randy. Rampage is just now getting his moment in the sun. He is one year into his title reign. Before that he was on a downward spin losing to Wand and Shogun. His two KOs of Liddell give him a strong case to be mentioned as the greatest LHW in the history of MMA.

Based on accomplishments though it should go Wand, Liddell, Rampage IMO.

at first i wanted to say, "what a good post from a white belt"

but you've been here a lot longer than most. you = QFT

[GOKUSON]

Wand is not the same fighter he was in 04, at that time i believe he was at his peak.

04 Wand would destroy Chuck, too many wars and beatings from heavyweight fighter have taken there toll on him.

[dip]

Originally Posted by ihavebignutz

all time. wandy

right now. rampage.

game to beat any of them during their prime, or right now: chuck.

chuck at his prime lost to rampage, and lost again last year. fail.

[Croatia_K1]

Chuck beat Wand once in a close decision

Wand almost killed Rampage

Rampage knocked Chuck out twice






IMHO.. Chuck couldn't finish Wandy.. Rampage couldn't finish Wandy


Wandy finished Rampage twice but couldn't be finished by chuck

Rampage finished chuck twice and got finished twice by wandy

Chuck got finished twice and won a decision.



So by this divine art of MMATH.


1. Wandy
2. Rampage
3. Chuck


Although if any of them fought each other it would be 50/50. They all have enough power to knock the other out

[katsoup]

i personally like chuck the best, but one element to take into consideration is that Rampage got beat down very decisively twice, chuck got beat down decisively twice. wand only lost once, and although he clearly lost the fight, showed promise and even knocked chuck down. it was close enough that it wouldnt be unfathomable for wand to take a rematch.

[LynchRippin]

Originally Posted by I Hate You

Ah, you have discovered MMA math. The math transcends explanation. To seek answers is to insult the precious conondrum.

ha, nice

[8KresniK8]

MMath dont work, styles make fights.

[Majin Buu]

Originally Posted by JKS

Well I did say Wand but not by much. I'd still consider Mezger and Nak better wins then Igor and Busta. Both guys that Wand beat were consistent 205'ers. Eventhough, Igor was in his prime, I highely consider Igor overated, I mean common the guy lost to every good fighter he fought. I loved him as a fighter, his early fights, but he was never a solid consistent fighter at either weight.

Explain how nak is better than Busta and Igor. Mezger too. Those two wins are still signifcant and as signifcant as Mezger and Nak. Plus Igor was a HW. And what about Illkhouine? I dont even think Nak had beaten Radleman yet. So nak was basically a chump for wanderlei to murder. Quit being biased and give respect where respect is due