|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
05-13-2008, 11:59 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Status:
|
|
Wand>Rampage? Chuck>Wand? Rampage>Chuck?
How to we indicate who is the best out of these three? Since all of them cancel eachother out, one of them has to be better than the other two. I mean, if we look at feats, I would say Rampage is the better striker than the other two. He went to K-1 and won 2 fights against a good K-1 fighter.
What do you guys think?
|
| |
|
05-14-2008, 12:03 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
In the narrow tank of thought.
Status:
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Majin Buu
Wand>Rampage? Chuck>Wand? Rampage>Chuck?
|
Ah, you have discovered MMA math. The math transcends explanation. To seek answers is to insult the precious conondrum.
__________________
"Of course I'd like to fight, but at the same time on NYE, I want to go see the UFC for sure." - Takanori Gomi
|
| |
|
05-14-2008, 12:04 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Brown Belt
Status:
|
|
Wand is the best because he's the only one with the balls to move up to heavyweight and face a K-1 champ on short notice + face a K-1 level heavyweight twice.
BTW Mr. Bruiser, how long do you think this account will last?
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/user/DetKimble23
Rogan: What's next for you BJ?
BJ: Let's ask the fans. Do you want to see BJ Penn fight GSP?!
*crickets*
BJ: I think it's obvious what the fans want. -CCH
|
| |
|
05-14-2008, 12:05 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Silver Belt
Status:
|
|
You cant say that Rampage is a better striker then Wand after taking 2 beating like he did. Its very simple, at this point, no one really stands out as the top guy since they cancel each other out.
Rampage>Chuck
Chuck>Wand
Wand>Rampage
Look at each matchup individually. But, this cycle will resolve itself by this time next year. Wand will most likely fight Chuck one more time, and possibly Rampage. Or Chuck will fight Rampage at some point. If both guys win their perspective fights.
Lets wait and see, now there is no answer. Purely by record though, I'd say Chuck at this point.
__________________
Win/Lose always in support of my fav fighters....
****Wand!!!!****
Nog
LeBanner
Sergei
Anderson
Manhoef
Mach
|
| |
|
05-14-2008, 12:06 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Status:
|
|
Rampage going to K-1 to face a kickboxer in his rules>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Wand facing a small HW in MMA.
|
| |
|
05-14-2008, 12:07 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Status:
|
|
Sucks>Your Thread
|
| |
|
05-14-2008, 12:08 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Status:
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JKS
You cant say that Rampage is a better striker then Wand after taking 2 beating like he did. Its very simple, at this point, no one really stands out as the top guy since they cancel each other out.
Rampage>Chuck
Chuck>Wand
Wand>Rampage
Look at each matchup individually. But, this cycle will resolve itself by this time next year. Wand will most likely fight Chuck one more time, and possibly Rampage. Or Chuck will fight Rampage at some point. If both guys win their perspective fights.
Lets wait and see, now there is no answer. Purely by record though, I'd say Chuck at this point.
|
Than shouldnt Rampage edge them both out a little bit? Since he>the one with the best resume?
|
| |
|
05-14-2008, 12:11 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Silver Belt
Status:
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Majin Buu
Than shouldnt Rampage edge them both out a little bit? Since he>the one with the best resume?
|
I'd say that Chuck has the best resume, followed by Wand and then Rampage. When you look at it Rampage only has big wins over Chuck 2x, Arona, Hendo, and Randleman.
Chuck resume is very impresive, he's basically beat everyone at LHW for the exception of Shogun and Arona that have been consistent ranked guys at 205.
__________________
Win/Lose always in support of my fav fighters....
****Wand!!!!****
Nog
LeBanner
Sergei
Anderson
Manhoef
Mach
|
| |
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:58 PM.
|