Quote:
Originally Posted by goodfella69
it's a personality issue. our politics reflect our personalities. i despise the whiny hippies, who always find something to bitch about. with bush it gets carried away. at least with dana, we don't have to listen to these starbucks-hoppin fudgepackers recycle the leftovers from the previous night's Colbert Report everywhere they go. but inside the mma realm, these same liberal minds are dead-set against the rich, evil, dana white and all of his profanity.
it's the same people bitching about both, regardless of what they say here. i can admit that i'm one of those assholes who likes dana and supports Dubya. i'm sure you'll find that most of the conservatives on this forum have had enough of tito ortiz.
|
i agree with you... i guess its just from my dislike with hippies who always find somethin to complain about .... just like some people on here always have problems with the ufc no matter what... its just annoyin to me...
everyone hates dana but will continue to watch ufc
everyone hates bush but when his term was up he won the election for a second term,, and not only did he win he beat the crap out of kerry.
a couple of ufc fighters complain and im sure they have good reasons, but after that everyone assumes all fighter are gettin screwed? if that were true why does the ufc have the biggest talent pool out there?? and there are plenty of fighters who are happy and are goin to re up thier contract as soon as they get a chance
the same with bush and the troops... dont get me wrong there is a lot of troops that get the green weenie it happens... i guess people forget about the large majority that cant wait to go to or go back to iraq, and the large amounts of people who love the military and make it a career
ohh and dana not bein able to sign fighters... this issue is not as simple as people may think there is a lot of things that have to be dealt with and the solution of "just give them more money" isnt always a smart one(just look at cro cop)
our invasion of iraq... this is also very complicated i mean the reasons for takin over is the removal of WMD's... this is one shitty situations with a lot more to than jus "bush lied"... i mean you have to remember that there were numerous sources of intelligence(not just U.S) that said iraq had WMD's... as the pres you have to act on situations of that nature.. i mean just look at 9/11, there was plenty of intel that said a big attack was comin and no one acted on it, which ended in the towers falling.. i dont think any president would have acted differently with the intel that bush was given about iraq, it jus sucks for him now cuz it was wrong and he gets all the blame.... ohh and it seems people forget that it takes an act of congress to go to war, so he wasnt the only one who decided to go to war..
edit** and pulling out of iraq just like that would be stupid, you cant just leave a country war torm, you have to finish what you started..