[punkmother]

Originally Posted by Saku4me

And for once, I agree with PunkMother.

it feels good to be on the right side of the discussion for once, doesn't it?

[BasRuttenFan]

Originally Posted by punkmother

it feels good to be on the right side of the discussion for once, doesn't it?

Hah, that made me laugh a bit.

[BasRuttenFan]

Originally Posted by BrooklynBomber

Afa Jr. was also the reason the new implimentations to piss test have been made, as he was caught using a Whizzinator, a la Onterrio Smith of the Minnesota Vikings.

Hayes should be fined 10 grand every time he uses a rascist term, 5 grand to the wrestler he offended, and 5 grand to a black charity group such as the United Negro College Fund.

He could be dipping into the savings by the sounds of it. How much do you suppose he makes per year?

[BrooklynBomber]

Originally Posted by BasRuttenFan

He could be dipping into the savings by the sounds of it. How much do you suppose he makes per year?

Hayes makes high 5 figures.

[Saku4me]

Originally Posted by pitfighter1

a little off topic but if wwe put together another brawl for it all who would you put in it. since this is hypeothetical the wrestlers can be active or retired alive or dead

If they were to do a brawl for all? Is it going to be with the same rules? If it was same rules, I know who wins...Benjamin. Benjamin was an All-American wrestler and since you get 5pts for every takedown, Benjamin would rack up on points and win. Brawl For All favors legit wrestlers as was obvious by Blackman vs. Mero (former GG).

So if they were to do a brawl for all, I'd take Benjamin right now.

As for all time WWE or pro wrestlers, I'll take I'll take Ken Shamrock because he can KO people and he can submit/take people down.

Other than Shammy, I'll take Angle. Best wrestling credentials and as I stated earlier, takedowns = 5 points therefore he wins.

[punkmother]

Originally Posted by Saku4me

If they were to do a brawl for all? Is it going to be with the same rules? If it was same rules, I know who wins...Benjamin. Benjamin was an All-American wrestler and since you get 5pts for every takedown, Benjamin would rack up on points and win. Brawl For All favors legit wrestlers as was obvious by Blackman vs. Mero (former GG).

So if they were to do a brawl for all, I'd take Benjamin right now.

As for all time WWE or pro wrestlers, I'll take Ken Shamrock because he can KO people and he can submit/take people down.

but didn't saba simba like kill lions with his bare hands?

[White Snake]

Originally Posted by BasRuttenFan

The difference is he holds a high position for a multi million dollar company. He's not operating the mustard dispencer at Burger King. (Not that it should be acceptable in that position either.)

Too shay, this is not the type of PR the WWE would want to have.

[rncgnp]

Sacrifice wasnt a bad PPV. it was the first TNA PPV ive seen (didnt order it, watched it on the web) the Terrodom basically looks like the elimination chamber without the chambers, and a hole at the tope.

[BrooklynBomber]

Originally Posted by punkmother

but didn't saba simba like kill lions with his bare hands?

Big deal. Outback Jack knocked out Kangaroos and ripped the heads off of dingos before they could eat anymore babies.

[KoscheckBaby]

In hindsight, the Brawl for All was a shitty idea, since it wasn't true fighting. There was no ground work, just takedowns, and none of the guys there are/were high level boxers.