|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
04-27-2007, 01:17 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
Blue Belt
| Location:
san diego, california |
Status:
|
|
how come when a PRIDE......(lil long)
fighter comes in2 the cage to fight. i'm read'n all these threads or hearing these fighter interviews that they need a couple fights or it takes time 2 adjust 2 the new ORG/rules. so if Fedor fought in the UFC, he should fight a couple undercards b4 fight'n 4 the belt, or how come when Chuck fought in PRIDE, nobody brought up him fight'n in a ring or a different ORG/rules? i just watchd a rampage interview and a lot of people brought up how he requestd a couple fights to get used 2 the cage/ORG. didn't he fight in a cage in the WFA? that was a rhetorical question bec i was 1 of the 5 people who orderd that PPV. i think rampage was beat'n Wandy until he caught those knees and i think he'll dominate Chuck unless the Iceman catches him w/ a couple BOMBS. i used 2 say support the fighters, not the ORG, but now the UFC owns Pride, literally.
__________________
MY TOP 5 FAV FIGHTERS:
1)BJ PENN
2)BRANDON VERA
3)GSP
4)FEDOR
5)SPENCER FISHER
5)DENIS KANG
|
| |
|
04-27-2007, 01:21 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Status:
|
|
Rampage has looked mediocre lately. It is understandable why he wanted another match or two before Chuck. I don't think it was because he isn't used to the cage.
|
| |
|
04-27-2007, 01:23 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Status:
|
|
|
| |
|
04-27-2007, 01:24 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Status:
|
|
Becaue Sherdoggers are, generally speaking, biased against the UFC.
|
| |
|
04-27-2007, 01:29 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Cock Goblin
Status:
|
|
1. Most everybody has fought in a ring before unless they're really old school when you could go directly from being a ditch digger to fighting in the UFC. Most orgs use rings.
2. Chuck already fought in Pride twice before losing to Rampage. And those two times probably weren't the only times he ever fought in a ring. He was a kickboxer first, after all.
3. Who does moving from a cage to a ring hurt? People look down more on people who can't get by without the use of a tool than on people who don't do as well when a tool is in play when the idea is to test unarmed combat.
__________________
What's the difference between Sarah Palin and Barack Obama?
One is a well turned-out, good-looking, and let's be honest, pretty sexy piece of eye-candy
The other kills her own food
|
| |
|
04-27-2007, 01:33 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Brown Belt
| Location:
San Diego, CA, USA |
Status:
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sodapop
fighter comes in2 the cage to fight. i'm read'n all these threads or hearing these fighter interviews that they need a couple fights or it takes time 2 adjust 2 the new ORG/rules. so if Fedor fought in the UFC, he should fight a couple undercards b4 fight'n 4 the belt, or how come when Chuck fought in PRIDE, nobody brought up him fight'n in a ring or a different ORG/rules? i just watchd a rampage interview and a lot of people brought up how he requestd a couple fights to get used 2 the cage/ORG. didn't he fight in a cage in the WFA? that was a rhetorical question bec i was 1 of the 5 people who orderd that PPV. i think rampage was beat'n Wandy until he caught those knees and i think he'll dominate Chuck unless the Iceman catches him w/ a couple BOMBS. i used 2 say support the fighters, not the ORG, but now the UFC owns Pride, literally.
|
Please take the time to write a coherent, legible post next time.
__________________
http://intentionalblogonballs.com/
|
| |
|
04-27-2007, 01:33 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Status:
|
|
Yep... Scooter Brown took the words right out of my mouth. Like he said, "Chuck already fought in Pride twice before losing to Rampage. And those two times probably weren't the only times he ever fought in a ring. He was a kickboxer first, after all."
|
| |
|
04-27-2007, 01:34 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Purple Belt
Status:
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroCopHughes
Becaue Sherdoggers are, generally speaking, biased against the UFC.
|
Please tell me youre joking or are you just seeing what u want to see coz i would say it was more around 70 - 30 bias to ufc. You just have to look at a few pages and see that about 90% of threads are about ufc.
__________________
TTTT
|
| |
|
04-27-2007, 01:36 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Status:
|
|
yes
|
| |
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:09 PM.
|