Carnage vs Spong SPOILER - Page 19

Ham_Roll · 07-07-2009, 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kaminoko

I'm not a Spong fan.I just dislike ***gs who call pro fighters scared.So I try to piss of the trolls the same way they piss me off. Thats all.

Sure your not every post is pro Spong by you and if you read my other thread first post i said Spong is no pussy but he is obviously afraid of Carnages elbows.

Ham_Roll · 07-07-2009, 09:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pink Butterfly

How do you know if Carnage knew the fight was over or not?

Because that goes against reason, that is to say that even if the ref did his job and waved the fight off with his hands in the air and inbetween the fighters Carnage still would of gone after Spong. If that was the case why wouldn't he continue to attack Spong when he dropped eg Hari vs Bonjansky. Also the fact that as soon as the ref got between the fighters Carnage stopped if you are saying he knew why would he stop attacking Spong you are using retard logic.

Pinoy Badboy** · 07-07-2009, 09:22 PM

I think spong had no qualms about fighting with elbows. The management should've backed off and let them fight with elbows.

Ham_Roll · 07-07-2009, 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kaminoko

Ham_roll you are looking for excuses to...It was also Carnage fault.

Im not looking for excuses it is plain to see the ref made a mistake and i have never said Carnage was not at fault aswell, i argue that in no way does it deserve a no contest.
You are arguing that Carnage is not better than Spong even though he knocked him out in a fight were the outcome was not major upset it was the best 2 fighters fighting, you are arguing that Spong is not afraid of Carnages elbows even though he would not fight Carnage if elbows were allowed on a Muay Thai card after he called Carnage out..... Do you see your retard logic here.

Pink Butterfly · 07-08-2009, 01:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ham_Roll

Because that goes against reason, that is to say that even if the ref did his job and waved the fight off with his hands in the air and inbetween the fighters Carnage still would of gone after Spong. If that was the case why wouldn't he continue to attack Spong when he dropped eg Hari vs Bonjansky. Also the fact that as soon as the ref got between the fighters Carnage stopped if you are saying he knew why would he stop attacking Spong you are using retard logic.

I am using "retard logic"? You are making assumptions on what Carnage was "thinking" at the momment before, during and after he hit Spong. Than you get mad when people disagree with you... But, I am using "retard logic"... LOL, ok. Maybe he didn't continue to hit Spong because he may of realized the fight was over? I don't know. Neither do you. You are making assumptions and why would Carnage keep hitting Spong when he was on the ground. LOL, but I am the one using "retard logic". Get a clue. Try not to call me a Spong nuthugger either. I like both fighters and could care less who won the fight.

Pink Butterfly · 07-08-2009, 01:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ham_Roll

Im not looking for excuses it is plain to see the ref made a mistake and i have never said Carnage was not at fault aswell, i argue that in no way does it deserve a no contest.

You might want to READ the rules instead of continuing to sound like a dumbass

Ham_Roll · 07-08-2009, 02:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pink Butterfly

I am using "retard logic"? You are making assumptions on what Carnage was "thinking" at the momment before, during and after he hit Spong. Than you get mad when people disagree with you... But, I am using "retard logic"... LOL, ok. Maybe he didn't continue to hit Spong because he may of realized the fight was over? I don't know. Neither do you. You are making assumptions and why would Carnage keep hitting Spong when he was on the ground. LOL, but I am the one using "retard logic". Get a clue. Try not to call me a Spong nuthugger either. I like both fighters and could care less who won the fight.

Exactly!!!!!!!!! So you can easily assume that he was not sure the fight was over, all logic and evidence of what happened makes this the most likely reason.
If he knew as you assume the fight was over and he just wanted to keep attacking Spong then why not continue attacking regardless of the ref that is what you are saying and that didnt happen as soon as the ref got between the fighters Carnage stopped, there is no basis for your foolish assumptions.

Ham_Roll · 07-08-2009, 02:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pink Butterfly

You might want to READ the rules instead of continuing to sound like a dumbass

You might want to take in account of the ref's faults in finishing the fight, before you sound like a Spong fan trying to make up any excuse so it doesn't look like he got KO'd by Carnage

Kaminoko · 07-08-2009, 05:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ham_Roll

Im not looking for excuses it is plain to see the ref made a mistake and i have never said Carnage was not at fault aswell, i argue that in no way does it deserve a no contest.
You are arguing that Carnage is not better than Spong even though he knocked him out in a fight were the outcome was not major upset it was the best 2 fighters fighting, you are arguing that Spong is not afraid of Carnages elbows even though he would not fight Carnage if elbows were allowed on a Muay Thai card after he called Carnage out..... Do you see your retard logic here.

Ofcourse its deserve a no contest,Ref did not say FIGHt or anything, he waved his hands up, meaning fight is over.
I already said this : Carnage was better that night.Like Sato was better that night when he knockt out buakaw.

Ofcourse he is not afraid, he is a pro fighter.Why should Spong fight Carnage under Carnages rules? Spong only has 1 FTR fight in his career. Spong called carnage out back in 2007 but carnage did not wan to fight him.

Ham_Roll · 07-08-2009, 07:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kaminoko

Ofcourse its deserve a no contest,Ref did not say FIGHt or anything, he waved his hands up, meaning fight is over.
I already said this : Carnage was better that night.Like Sato was better that night when he knockt out buakaw.

Ofcourse he is not afraid, he is a pro fighter.Why should Spong fight Carnage under Carnages rules? Spong only has 1 FTR fight in his career. Spong called carnage out back in 2007 but carnage did not wan to fight him.

Ref did not stay between fighters infact he stepped backwards and then waved his hands parrell at shoulder height not above his head which is the norm, that was what caused the confusion.
Would you say that when Sato beat Buakaw he was regarded as the no 1 or 2 in the world, would you say it was a fight between the best 2. Are you saying Carnage winning is a massive upset.....seriously you are a fool all your assumptions and claims have absolutely no basis.
Carnage being no 1 there is many basis's for that claim, Spong being afraid of Carnages elbows again there are many basis's to that claim while you just spew out what you want to believe