Wandy and the Ice Man: 3 strikes you're out

waterdragon · 10-29-2007, 08:44 AM

Should these two be given easier fights before facing each other? I'm just wondering what a third defeat in a row would do to either of them.

rysco · 10-29-2007, 08:47 AM

Chuck would be bad because UFC is big and everyone knows its 3 in a row

For Wandy not many americans know him and therefore wont have the same effects.

i think it willl be much a good fight it doesnt matter!

Pride_Killa · 10-29-2007, 08:47 AM

It wouldn't do shit...

Hammerwulf · 10-29-2007, 08:48 AM

Fuck no they shouldn't be given easier fights. Chuck was given a supposed easy fight in Keith Jardine and look how that turned out. Wandy is a warrior and I doubt he'd pick an easier fight over Chuck.

sheddy · 10-29-2007, 08:52 AM

No.
Need to see this fight.

I don't like labelling some fights "easy".
The way things have gone this year, it's all about upsets.

Led · 10-29-2007, 09:10 AM

An "easy" fight? Just like Pulver (Lauzon), Lil Nog (Soko), GSP (Serra), Crocop (Gonzaga), Jardine (Alexander), Liddell (Jardine) had "easy" fights?

If there's one thing Dana learned this year, it's fuck the warm-up fights.

domd · 10-29-2007, 09:13 AM

they should not get gimm fights, im less interested in them and sometimes it goes wrong^^

glacier · 10-29-2007, 09:22 AM

give them an easier fight first?

thats an insult to the fighters.

GladE8R007 · 10-29-2007, 09:28 AM

Chuck vs, Wand = 600,000 PPV's HEADLINING

Wand vs. Dean Lister = (Insert number of Sherdog members here) PPV's 4th fight on the card.

Thats why Wand fights Chuck....simple A-Rith-Ma-Tic.

WE know who and what Wand is...but its time to face facts...Many more people know Bisping or Evans....It sucks, but its true.

And 3 strikes??? I doubt it. Wand is brand new to many fans, so the Pride fights do not amount to much. Chuck is so big he will need about 2 more KO losses to go away.