Sherdog Mixed Martial Arts Forums

Go Back   Sherdog Mixed Martial Arts Forums > Fight Discussion > The Heavyweights: UFC and WEC


The Heavyweights: UFC and WEC Discuss all Zuffa-related promotions: UFC, WEC and former Pride events here.

Reply
 
LinkBack (3) Thread Tools
Old 06-25-2008, 11:03 PM   #111 (permalink)

White Belt
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 119
"Don't you think some of the other major MMA news resources would have reported on the deal??"

They did. Check out Josh Gross's article on SI.com.

Fairly reputable source, I hear.
Macedawgg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2008, 11:04 PM   #112 (permalink)

Orange Belt
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 422
This is how I break it down. The NBA, NFL have figures that amount to about 6%-10% on merchandising sales per player. If MMA wants to be the NFL they are easily in the wheel house for merchandising. Former players in many cases get ZERO. Throwback Jearsys in most cases pay no Royalties, similar to early UFC dvd's. Now here the thing. The MMA in general has no real bargaining leverage because the fighters negotiate on their own. Another thing to consider is how Key to the UFC is lets say Randy Couture? Will paying Randy 5 million per fight bring in an additional 5 million in revenue per fight? Or will it work out better to pay a fighter like Werdum 70 thousand? The fighters do not sell the UFC. It sells itself. Titos, Randys and whoever wants more money will come and go but that MMA will live on. Getting 10%-20% is a lot.
mr. berndto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2008, 11:05 PM   #113 (permalink)

White Belt
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 129
Quote:
Originally Posted by Macedawgg View Post
"Don't you think some of the other major MMA news resources would have reported on the deal??"

They did. Check out Josh Gross's article on SI.com.

Fairly reputable source, I hear.
Link???
__________________
I got nothing.
ObnoxiousHotdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2008, 11:05 PM   #114 (permalink)

White Belt
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 129
Quote:
Originally Posted by Macedawgg View Post
"Don't you think some of the other major MMA news resources would have reported on the deal??"

They did. Check out Josh Gross's article on SI.com.

Fairly reputable source, I hear.
Link???
__________________
I got nothing.
ObnoxiousHotdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2008, 11:06 PM   #115 (permalink)

Black Belt
 
jigsaw99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,481
The term of the Agreement lasts forever, and the Marketing Rights for fighter are held by Zuffa even after a fighter is cut!

^ holy shit...
__________________
In Soviet Russia Fedor Emelianenko forks you.
jigsaw99 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2008, 11:07 PM   #116 (permalink)

White Belt
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 119
UFC's merchandise agreement is*good in theory, not on paper - Josh Gross - SI.com
Macedawgg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2008, 11:09 PM   #117 (permalink)

White Belt
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 146
First of all, I question this source. Those aren't legal sentences. So, who says it's actually credible and exact wording. Those don't seem like legal terms or wording to me.

Secondly, some of those are flat out illegal, especially according to labor and intellectual property laws in California and New York. While this contract is probably being signed in Las Vegas, business is being conducted by many fighters in California, so you could legally argue the laws are California enforced.

Third, as someone pointed out, you should take a look at music contracts. They have some similarities, and in fact, I'd say musicians are getting raped even more. These contracts are standard. Some of those numbers actually aren't horrible. The key word in some of that was "gross" profits. 10-20% is better than 5%.

Overall, I don't think this is that bad. I have seen a lot worse. The UFC really doesn't screw fighters that badly. I am in the entertainment business and from time to time deal with the MMA business. I haven't seen many of the fighters hurting at all. Sponsors and the UFC want these fighters to stay in good standings, or they can't survive to fight.

If I were you guys, I'd start pointing fingers at attorneys and managers. Their goals are ultimately to make money on a large-scale and for their own companies. That means they have allegiance more towards the UFC and the organizations, rather than fighters. Yet, they would never claim that. Think about it. Piss off the UFC who you have future business with, or let a few things slip by?
FightCrew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2008, 11:10 PM   #118 (permalink)

White Belt
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 119
Where quotes are used in reference to the Agreement, they are taken directly from the Agreement itself.

Formatting, such as bolding, underlines, or italics was added by myself for emphasis at times.
Macedawgg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2008, 11:12 PM   #119 (permalink)

White Belt
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 119
Quote:
Originally Posted by FightCrew View Post
If I were you guys, I'd start pointing fingers at attorneys and managers. Their goals are ultimately to make money on a large-scale and for their own companies. That means they have allegiance more towards the UFC and the organizations, rather than fighters. Yet, they would never claim that. Think about it. Piss off the UFC who you have future business with, or let a few things slip by?
interesting comment
Macedawgg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2008, 11:14 PM   #120 (permalink)

White Belt
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by ObnoxiousHotdog View Post
Is this entire thread a troll job?
What the fuck is MMAFA??? Is this anything close to a credible source?

It's a fucking blog!!! How can any of you take this as a credible place for these details for the agreement?

Don't you think some of the other major MMA news resources would have reported on the deal??

My God, you guys are just looking for shit to bitch about. MMAFA.tw.blog has one post and no details about anything.

TS hasnt posted anything else other then this thread.

How come its so easy for you all to believe anything anti-UFC?
Billion-Dollar UFC Enters Merchandising in Big Way: Good Deal For Fighters? | The Official Blog of the MMAFA
Published:
06.21.08 / 6pm


UFC's merchandise agreement is*good in theory, not on paper - Josh Gross - SI.com
Posted: Tuesday June 24, 2008 2:22PM; Updated: Wednesday June 25, 2008 10:11AM


http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/06/...ing-agreement/
June 24, 2008


Report: Not all fighters on board with UFC's merchandise rights agreement | Fight Ticker
Posted June 24th, 2008 by Fight Ticker



there's quite a few more, if you still dont believe. also, you'll notice a few of those actually cite the MMAFA as the source.....

Quote:
Rob Maysey has further comments on the UFC merchandising contract being offered to fighters.
- from Fightopinion Radio
FortheLoveofMMA is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.sherdog.net/forums/f2/ufc-merchandising-agreement-fighters-get-scammed-803524/
Posted By For Type Date
FanNation | Sports by the Numbers MMA | Business Stuff: UFC vs. the Fighters! This thread Refback 07-16-2008 10:23 PM
Sports by the Numbers MMA This thread Refback 06-26-2008 04:21 AM
The Heavyweights: UFC and WEC - Sherdog Mixed Martial Arts Forums This thread Refback 06-24-2008 09:06 PM


Latest Threads



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:03 PM.

Sherdog.com Forum Rules Clear Cookies Social Groups Lost Password

Skin made by Alex. © iStyles.uni.cc Powered by vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2009 Sherdog.com | Privacy Policy | Click here to advertise on Sherdog