Sherdog Mixed Martial Arts Forums

Go Back   Sherdog Mixed Martial Arts Forums > Fight Discussion > The Heavyweights: UFC and WEC


The Heavyweights: UFC and WEC Discuss all Zuffa-related promotions: UFC, WEC and former Pride events here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-08-2007, 05:35 PM   #1 (permalink)

Green Belt
 
NasDarq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 951
Should knees to the head to a downed opponent be legal?

Should knees to the head to a downed opponent be legal in the US?

First, this is a crucial aspect of the fight game. When a fight hits the ground, the north south position seems to always be apparent.

A fight could easily end in a KO from this position for the dominant wrestler. Instead, what happens most of the time is that the bottom fighter gets right up and gains the striking advantage (if indeed his dominance is in striking).

knees to on the ground is no different in pain than knees standing up if done properly (muay thai technique).

ground and pound is becoming disadvantageous ever since this was banned by NSAC.

I remember how dominant Mark Coleman was when he could utilize this aspect of the game. Since he was a dominant wrestler, he would get the dominant position then TKO the guy with knees to the head.

it's the same as elbows in the clinch. if this is taken out of the game then the strategies will change a lot.

I'm not saying that kicks on the ground should be legalized also but that might be another crucial element in the fight game that is negated. For now, knees to the head should be considered to be reinstated because it negates too many strategies of the fight game.

Am I brutal or barbarish for thinking this or should this be a part of MMA again in the US?

What are your opinions?
NasDarq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2007, 05:37 PM   #2 (permalink)
Banned
 
Kayo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,468
I think they should be legal... it's an unfair advantage for grapplers IMO.

It makes no sense that elbows to a downed opponent are allowed yet knees to a downed opponent aren't.
Kayo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2007, 05:39 PM   #3 (permalink)

Blue Belt
 
Fenrir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 716
should definitely be legal
__________________
Will roll for food.
Fenrir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2007, 05:39 PM   #4 (permalink)
The Demon From Within
 
shogunera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Brooklyn NYC
Posts: 4,318
Quote:
Originally Posted by NasDarq
Should knees to the head to a downed opponent be legal in the US?

First, this is a crucial aspect of the fight game. When a fight hits the ground, the north south position seems to always be apparent.

A fight could easily end in a KO from this position for the dominant wrestler. Instead, what happens most of the time is that the bottom fighter gets right up and gains the striking advantage (if indeed his dominance is in striking).

knees to on the ground is no different in pain than knees standing up if done properly (muay thai technique).

ground and pound is becoming disadvantageous ever since this was banned by NSAC.

I remember how dominant Mark Coleman was when he could utilize this aspect of the game. Since he was a dominant wrestler, he would get the dominant position then TKO the guy with knees to the head.

it's the same as elbows in the clinch. if this is taken out of the game then the strategies will change a lot.

I'm not saying that kicks on the ground should be legalized also but that might be another crucial element in the fight game that is negated. For now, knees to the head should be considered to be reinstated because it negates too many strategies of the fight game.

Am I brutal or barbarish for thinking this or should this be a part of MMA again in the US?

What are your opinions?
Good post, I also believe knees to a downed opponent should be considered fair game.
__________________
PSN: animefreek9889

[OLD SCHOOL AV/SIG BETTING IN WASTELAND]
Av/Sig: 95-40-9
SPC: 15-9
shogunera is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2007, 05:40 PM   #5 (permalink)

Green Belt
 
disgustud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Upstate South Carolina
Posts: 1,475
Your not brutal, and I think you have made a very good argument as to why they should be legal.

I do not understand why anyone (i.e. fans of MMA) would have a problem with knees in the four point position. The fact that they are not allowed in the states, except Hawaii, is IMO because of boxing's power in combat sports commisioning.
__________________
Minister of White Soul, Bourbon, and Ambidextrous Jaggin'

BTYC - Pimp Nation
disgustud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2007, 05:40 PM   #6 (permalink)

Brown Belt
 
UFCFAN4lyfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: L.A. where they dont play Esse
Posts: 2,772
I not only think knees should be allowed, but stomps and soccer kicks should be allowed as well.
UFCFAN4lyfe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2007, 05:41 PM   #7 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 6,003
Quote:
I not only think knees should be allowed, but stomps and soccer kicks should be allowed as well.
Agreed...
Juddy J is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2007, 05:44 PM   #8 (permalink)

Yellow Belt
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 219
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kayo
I think they should be legal... it's an unfair advantage for grapplers IMO.

It makes no sense that elbows to a downed opponent are allowed yet knees to a downed opponent aren't.
My thoughts exactly. I personally believe that elbows can be much more detrimental to a fighter's career than a knee. I, like the vast majority of the legion of sherdoggers, have seen some nasty cuts as a result of elbows.
__________________
Question the Knowledge!
Bar Room Hero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2007, 05:45 PM   #9 (permalink)

Purple Belt
 
Flyin Heel Hook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NJ/NY
Posts: 1,529
I agree with knees but not stomps and soccer kicks.
Flyin Heel Hook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2007, 05:46 PM   #10 (permalink)

Green Belt
 
WOOG-E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tallahassee
Posts: 1,207
From what I understand, this rule was required by the NSAC in order for them to sanction the UFC. I read somewhere that one of the commissioners was reviewing tapes of MMA, happened upon a fight where Gan McGee stopped some guy w/ multiple knees to the head, thought it was too brutal, and insisted that it not be allowed. It's a shitty rule, but it probably won't be discarded any time soon.
__________________
Me daddy was a blueshirt, my mother a madam.
My brother earned his medals at Mai Lai in Vietnam.

Last edited by WOOG-E; 01-08-2007 at 06:01 PM.
WOOG-E is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




Latest Threads



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:09 PM.

Sherdog.com Forum Rules Clear Cookies Social Groups Lost Password

Skin made by Alex. © iStyles.uni.cc Powered by vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2009 Sherdog.com | Click here to advertise on Sherdog