Sherk passes a lie detector test about steriod use - Page 4

anthro_emesis · 10-05-2007, 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WrestlingGuru

because every time someone goes to court and asks for an extension so they can present their case properly automatically means their guilty.

have you lived in the same world we live in for long, pretty much anytime you hire a lawyer to do any work for you and it involves anytype of hearing the first thing the lawyer does is file an extension.

I never said he was guilty. I simply said that it seemed suspicious. He claimed he knew what went into his body, so 10 days should have been enough time to prove that. If he was so positive he was clean he wouldnt have needed to run to the best steroid lawyer he could find. Suspicious, that's all.

gemnasty · 10-05-2007, 12:52 PM

it doesn't matter, he was going to lose to BJ anyway. Now when BJ beats Joe Daddy for the LW title, Sherk can get a shot and lose just like he was going to anyway.

Marteeny · 10-05-2007, 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by acyron

Another:
http://www.mmaweekly.com/absolutenm/...4365&zoneid=13

So whatever. As far I see it, he's lying on that for sure.

Well thanks for looking, but neither of those sources quoted Sherk saying he had not heard of Nandro. The one on MMA weekly is quoting Armando Garcia as I stated above, and the first source has a statement from Sherk, but he never said he had not heard of it. The article mentions it, but it was probably referring to what Garcia said, as there was no quote from Sherk.

I'm not saying it couldn't be true, but I have never seen a direct quote from Sherk stating he has never heard of Nandro.

Marteeny · 10-05-2007, 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by anthro_emesis

If he was so positive he was clean he wouldnt have needed to run to the best steroid lawyer he could find. Suspicious, that's all.

That is some of the worst logic I have ever seen. So if you were accused of murder (and you were innocent), you would not want the best lawyer possible because it might look suspicious?

Junior Soprano · 10-05-2007, 01:02 PM

Didn't OJ pass a lie detector test once?

acyron · 10-05-2007, 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marteeny

Well thanks for looking, but neither of those sources quoted Sherk saying he had not heard of Nandro. The one on MMA weekly is quoting Armando Garcia as I stated above, and the first source has a statement from Sherk, but he never said he had not heard of it. The article mentions it, but it was probably referring to what Garcia said, as there was no quote from Sherk.

I'm not saying it couldn't be true, but I have never seen a direct quote from Sherk stating he has never heard of Nandro.

You try too hard to defend Sean Sherk. An executive director of an athletic commission wouldn't claim that he claims other guy said something if it didn't happen. Gimme a break.

jp6tool99 · 10-05-2007, 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wormed

It definitely helps his case. Although not used as proof, I'm sure it'll go a long way into deciding his innocence. Sherk is innocent. Said it since the start. The man has ALWAYS been a beast. Who wants to see BJ vs Sherk? I know I do.

me to, ang I agree w/ everything u said. When has he ever not looked like that. Did anybody watch his workout. That is the craziest work ethic I have ever seen...

anthro_emesis · 10-05-2007, 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marteeny

That is some of the worst logic I have ever seen. So if you were accused of murder (and you were innocent), you would not want the best lawyer possible because it might look suspicious?

before or after I fail my murder piss test? Let's not act like there is no evidence against Sherk.

Spawned_Fighter · 10-05-2007, 01:08 PM

i just want to find out if he did or didnt juice. we need the lightweight title in the picture again.

louieb · 10-05-2007, 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by anthro_emesis

I never said he was guilty. I simply said that it seemed suspicious. He claimed he knew what went into his body, so 10 days should have been enough time to prove that. If he was so positive he was clean he wouldnt have needed to run to the best steroid lawyer he could find. Suspicious, that's all.

So, if your accused of something you didn't do, you'll go out and find the worst lawyer you can? Or better yet represent yourself?

Riiiggghhhhttttt!

No offense man but you have to remember this is his life. This is how these people pay for things. In my eyes him fighting it so much makes him look more innocent than anything. Put yourself in his shoes. Say you didn't take them, then tell me if 10 days would be enough time to get proof you didn't.