|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
08-30-2007, 12:35 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
 Green Belt
Status:
|
|
i think soccer kicks are safer than knees and stomps.
i think soccer kicks are safer than knees and stomps.
stomps are unsafe for obvious reasons and knees are pretty bad due to the fact that u can hold an opponent for a long period of time and knee them ala arona vs sakuraba. knees from sidemount is also very brutal
with soccer kicks, you have to step back which allows ur opponent to either defend or fall into his back for defense.
and by soccer kick, i mean only soccer kicks to a person NOT on his back. i think being on your back should be the only position that soccer kicks should not be allowed.
so with that being said. i think the rules should allow soccer kicks and leave the elbows in to be fair to all the styles of martial arts.
|
|
| |
|
|
08-30-2007, 12:36 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
 Green Belt
| Status:
|
|
uh huh...
__________________
Check it out www.mmajacked.com
|
|
| |
|
|
08-30-2007, 12:37 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
So cool that I can mix with water
| Location:
Wherever I may roam |
| Status:
|
|
You cant allow one without the others
Soccer kicks are as dangerous as knee to the head, not that dangerous in fact.
I think UFC should use all 3 overseas. And NSAC should allow them too
__________________
State Trooper: Pullover!
Harry: No, it's a cardigan but thanks for noticing.
Lloyd: Yeah, killer boots man!
http://www.arresteddevelopment2009.com/
|
|
| |
|
|
08-30-2007, 12:41 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
 Blue Belt
| Location:
Lowell/Massachusetts |
| Status:
|
|
no elbow
__________________
"In 1976 more than 70 thousand Corinthians fans left Sao Paulo to watch their team play. It was recorded as the biggest human displacement in peace time, according to the Guinness Book of Records"
|
|
| |
|
|
08-30-2007, 12:50 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
 Brown Belt
| Status:
|
|
Soccer kicks are the most brutal of the three because most of the time they are thrown is after a fighter has already been dazed by a punch and fallen down and can't defend themself properly.
__________________
Vote Libertarian.
Favorite Fighters:
Andrei Arlovski
Diego Sanchez
Hermes Franca
Gina Carano
Miguel Torres
|
|
| |
|
|
08-30-2007, 12:59 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Green Belt
| Status:
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NMMMAFan
Soccer kicks are the most brutal of the three because most of the time they are thrown is after a fighter has already been dazed by a punch and fallen down and can't defend themself properly.
|
i see what u mean but in this situation, it could be used in a takedown attempt. and all you have to do is go on ur back where i say it shouldnt be allowed. |
|
| |
|
|
08-30-2007, 01:03 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
brazilian kick
| Status:
|
|
soccer kicks are fine, not a lot of momentum behind it, head kicks are much more dangerous
|
|
| |
|
|
08-30-2007, 01:07 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Green Belt
| Status:
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neu!
soccer kicks are fine, not a lot of momentum behind it, head kicks are much more dangerous
|
yea, thats what im thinking, they sometimes end fights that are stopped by the ref but they never knock anyone out. |
|
| |
|
|
08-30-2007, 01:09 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Blue Belt
| Location:
Lowell/Massachusetts |
| Status:
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mini_robot
but u guys understand what im trying to say right? with the rules i stated, you can only do soccer kicks from a guy who shoots on u. u cant soccer kick to a guy on his back.
|
no i dont. i need pictures to understand __________________
"In 1976 more than 70 thousand Corinthians fans left Sao Paulo to watch their team play. It was recorded as the biggest human displacement in peace time, according to the Guinness Book of Records"
|
|
| |
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:27 PM.
|
