Quote:
Originally Posted by Det_Kimble
I would put Fedor at 2 until he fights/beats a credible opponent (Monson or Rizzo for example), but I would be able to see how some would still keep him at 1. The situation is different now because CroCop hasn't looked great recently, and if Nog doesn't beat Tim, it just makes it hard to justify his (Fedor's) current #1 rank.
|
it doesn't just make it hard, it makes it IMPOSSIBLE. if tim beats nog, that doesn't just take away fedors credibility as #1 current, but also puts a good stain on his crediblity for this "best fighter of all time" bullshit.
the fact is, other than crocop and noguiera, fedor has fought: basically NOBODY worth mentioning.
i am by no means a UFC 'hugger though i am sure i will be flamed as such by ignorant people who need to call names like little children, instead of using the reasoning faculties of the mind.
i mean you've got heath herring (lost to a ufc nobody) semmy schilt (never had any real success in mma) kevin randleman (lost to basically everybody except one freak win over CC) mark coleman (built his name in the beginning of the ufc, then lost to everybody) gary goodridge (never any real success in mma) kazuyuki fujita (japanese pro wrestler, little to no success in mma)
...
where is this "top" competition he's fought? all those guys above are tough for sure. but they haven't been at the top levels of competition for quite some time, if ever. the guys that have been making things move at HW have been rizzo, monson, sylvia, arlovski, rodriguez, barnett.
so maybe guys in/from the ufc have more losses. such is the nature of mma, especially at the highest levels. barnett is the only guy that props up crocop and nog really.
i'm not going to continue this, it's not worth my efforts. i'm not saying fedor isn't good, i fuckin love the guy. he's hella good, fun to watch, always puts on a good show, never a boring or conservative fighter. but to say he is "the greatest of all time" because he has fought a lower level of competition for most of his career, and managed to get through them all unscathed by a loss... is this really what makes a great fighter? or is it winning the BIG fights, the guys at the absolute top, the guys that can't be questioned.
putting fedor against opposition like semmy schilt (again) HMC, zuluzhino, ...even mark hunt is a questionable opponent when it comes to mma, especially in light of recent events. putting him against these guys and still saying #1 is an insult. just because you don't lose in fights that are basically set up for you to win...
that's all i got to say.
sylvia beats nog, the rankings change big time, and i think fedor has some serious credibility isssues.