|
 |
|
|
|
 |
11-24-2007, 04:06 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
| Location:
Laptop on the Beach, HAWAII |
Status:
|
|
Losing fat without weight training????
I've been eating clean for a couple weeks now, and been consistently training in MMA, i think i'm doing well, but every resource i find recommends some form of weight training. but the thing is, i don't think i can fit going to the gym into my schedule.
I can defintely run, and do conditioning/calisthenics/floor exercises
i'm not even good at calisthenics (pushups, situps, pullups, dips etc.), so i think i have a lot to gain from these exercises. And i also think the calisthenics & bodyweight exercises would help my kickboxing/grappling training more than lifting at the gym. It also seems like REAL weightlifting is an advanced type of exercise for people with a good strength base.
Is lifting weights a MUST for fat loss? or are they talking any type of resistance exercise more than anything? I mean i'm already doing very explosive/high intensity training with the boxing/MMA.
what do you guys think? I am 30-40 pounds overfat, i'm looking to start competing 8 months to a year from now, so im not in a terrible hurry to lower my bodyfat.
|
| |
|
11-24-2007, 04:15 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
| Location:
Laptop on the Beach, HAWAII |
Status:
|
|
oh and i'm 5'6" 190lbs, my lean body mass according to the gym is 157lbs
i'm pretty stocky, for some reason i already have a pretty good amount of muscle, probably from doing sports all my life, but if i had to compare my bone structure to someone it would have to be hermes franca or jorge gurgel. or rickson.
im trying to get down to 155 or 145 if possible.
Last edited by BabyRj : 11-24-2007 at 04:20 PM.
|
| |
|
11-24-2007, 05:03 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Amateur Fighter
Status:
|
|
keep doing what your doing, run, train, eat clean, and do alot of bodyweight exercises. The thing is you really don't need to do a ton of weight lifting until you can handle your bodyweight in a good balanced manner.
|
| |
|
11-24-2007, 05:12 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
| Location:
Laptop on the Beach, HAWAII |
Status:
|
|
thx for the advice guys.
ever since gaining weight, i haven't even been able to do a good 50 pushups. or 5 pullups, this was one of my concerns.
resistance training is resistance training after all right?
|
| |
|
11-25-2007, 03:39 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Orange Belt
Status:
|
|
yeah i agree with both previous posters, weight training is not NECESSARY at least not in the very beginning, but bodyweight training will only take you so far once you master the techniques (e.g. doing 500 crunches a day isnt going to do much more than 50 crunches a day, at that point you need to consider adding some weights, etc.)
__________________
<--- This is how, this is how, this is how I squat.
"I hate most of the people I know and all of the people I don't." --- bacon
"Always wear hair gel, even if you're bald." --- Saith
|
| |
|
11-25-2007, 10:08 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Green Belt
Status:
|
|
High intensity circuits could easily fit in the place of a calisthenics routine. Doing weights doesn't always mean being in the gym for an hour.
Surprised nobody has mentioned it yet but go check out Ross Enamait's Infinite Intensity program. He's a boxing coach by trade and has tailored his workouts to fit around skill and cardio training as a vital supplement.
Weights isn't just about getting stronger, it's also about strengthening vital components in the body such as tendons, ligaments, bones and the CNS.
I recall BJ Penn stating that the lack of weights was probably part of the reason he blew a rib against Hughes.
__________________
"Well, I can do 16 pull-ups, and I'm 51 and I weigh 210. So you have to beat me or you're a pussy. And if you do beat me, you're probably using drugs."
- M. Rippetoe
|
| |
|
11-25-2007, 04:33 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
| Location:
Laptop on the Beach, HAWAII |
Status:
|
|
ok, i think i can compromise. I've been reading alot of fitness books, but i realized one thing.
All these books are intended for non-athletes i.e. sedentary people. I guess that is why they recommend alot of pointless machine movements in they're lifting.
I figure i can head to the gym and do some squats/deadlifts/overhead presses/snatches 2 or 3 times a week, maybe even benchpress, but no more than that. I just dont wanna get into the whole "bodypart splitting" exercises/routines and endless sets/reps, especially with machines, i hate machines. And i don't wanna exhaust my muscles too often with too many exercises.
is that good?
|
| |
|
11-25-2007, 04:47 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Status:
|
|
You could get a good 2 or 3 day split with that. I would recommend lifting because you won't get much stronger doing body weight stuff compared to using a good strength building routine. Check the S&P FAQ for good ideas on a 2 or 3 day split routine.
__________________
In theory there is no difference between theory and practice, but, in practice, there is.
"Slacks are a species of bird" - Fatty's story
|
| |
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:23 AM.
|