Save
Random Shot: 
 

Welcome to the Sherdog Mixed Martial Arts Forums forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

 

Go Back  Sherdog Mixed Martial Arts Forums > Training Discussion > Dieting / Supplement Discussion > CEE vs. Monohydrate

Reply
 
Sherdog Forums
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-27-2006, 06:13 PM   #1 (permalink)

Purple Belt
 
Hostage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA
Posts: 1,551
Status: Hostage is offline
CEE vs. Monohydrate

I've talked to many different people and all have their own opinions about what type of creatine is the best.

They say CEE is basically monohydrate but with added ester so there's not a big difference.

Some say monohydrate is the better of the two, where others say CEE is the best.

I'm going to be switching to a creatine supp in about a week...so I wanted to know what you brilliant Sherdoggers think on which one is the best. Yes, I did a search. But nothing came up on the debate of CEE vs. Monohydrate. Like to hear your responses. Thanks in advance.
__________________
“I fear not the man who has practiced 10,000 kicks once, but I fear the man who has practiced one kick 10,000 times.” - Bruce Lee

Proud member of the Jan. 2006 Sherdog babyboomers club.
Hostage is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote

Old 04-27-2006, 06:28 PM   #2 (permalink)
SBC Underworld Czar
 
King Kabuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Behind you with a lead pipe.
Posts: 22,071
Status: King Kabuki is offline
Send a message via AIM to King Kabuki
Esterfied creatine is bonded creatine that allows for it to completely bypass the liver (basically). The suppsed advantages of CEE versus Monohydrate are:

1) No water-bloating.

2) No loading necessary (not that it's necessary with monohydrate either).

3) No cycling necessary.

If you want a medium between basic monohydrate (which can and often does cause uncomfortable water bloating) and expensive CEE, you might want to look into AAKG Creatine. It's present in NO-Xplode, and GNC sells a liquid version that is getting very good reviews. I don't know what other companies make it isolated that are reputable but I'm sure they're out there.

As far as the higher-end creatine compounds, Cellmass and Fast Twitch seem to be doing the best.
__________________
"You Son of a bitch double-crosser. You are no good, your word is no good. Nothing is good about you. You're gonna get hurt, and by hurt, I mean Dead." - Frankie Carbo

Mods Worship the Devil!
King Kabuki is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2006, 06:34 PM   #3 (permalink)

Yellow Belt
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 220
Status: tshay2003 is offline
Monohydrate tend to cost very little, so you can get a lot for a little. The downside is, it doesnt tend to uptake as well as the newer versions.

CEE will be expensive, but they claim near 100% uptake.
tshay2003 is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2006, 06:42 PM   #4 (permalink)

Purple Belt
 
Hostage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA
Posts: 1,551
Status: Hostage is offline
Thanks Kabuk and tshay.

I'm taking NO-Xplode right now and it seems to be working good so I'll most likely stick with BSN and get their cellmass since everybody seems to praise it so much. I know cellmass is CEE and I've only taken Monohydrate in the past. It did give me a little bloating, of course I was drinking beer all the time too so it's a bit hard to tell, lol.

I know Cellmass is a bit expensive, but I have no time to dick around with below average products.

The AAKG Creatine sounds interesting...maybe I'll do a little research on that before I make my final decision. GNC is right across the street...too bad I don't have my fucking gold card anymore....it's almost a new month.
__________________
“I fear not the man who has practiced 10,000 kicks once, but I fear the man who has practiced one kick 10,000 times.” - Bruce Lee

Proud member of the Jan. 2006 Sherdog babyboomers club.
Hostage is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2006, 08:41 PM   #5 (permalink)

White Belt
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: con mi muerto
Posts: 132
Status: Mobsta is offline
personally have tried both cee worked best for "me",, no bloating, only take it on work out days (2),, when on cee i worked out 3x a week and took 5g (supposedly about a spoon full)..

try this place out, if you order about 300g it should last about 2-3 months, depending on how many times you work out of course.. good luck

http://66.63.171.49/store/comersus_v...idProduct=2369
Mobsta is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2006, 08:08 AM   #6 (permalink)
Banned
 
Boondocksaint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Back in the states
Posts: 2,272
Status: Boondocksaint is offline
CEE has been golden for me. And at bulknutrition.com it is cheap.
Boondocksaint is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2006, 10:09 AM   #7 (permalink)
Yes, we can't!
 
fat_wilhelm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: opening graves
Posts: 4,909
Status: fat_wilhelm is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hostage
I'll most likely stick with BSN and get their cellmass since everybody seems to praise it so much.
Good choice.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hostage
I was drinking beer all the time
Good choice.
fat_wilhelm is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2006, 11:42 AM   #8 (permalink)
DCS

White Belt
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 94
Status: DCS is offline
I found that Creatine Monohydrate only worked well once for me. Maybe CEE, due to bypassing the liver, may be a better path to take.
DCS is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2007, 11:39 AM   #9 (permalink)

Blue Belt
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 565
Status: drumerdud is offline
but whats better for sports performance?
drumerdud is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2007, 11:40 AM   #10 (permalink)
Professional Fighter
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 9,086
Status: Ian Coe is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by drumerdud View Post
but whats better for sports performance?
Read more carefully

They are the same thing, different transport mechanism
__________________
Kilogram lifting S&P revolutionary




Myprotein.co.uk 5% discount code- MP225
Ian Coe is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote

Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Warning to Those Who Have Lower Back Pain While on Creatine Monohydrate amasotto Dieting / Supplement Discussion 19 03-15-2006 03:31 PM
the gnc creatine monohydrate pills sj samuraii Dieting / Supplement Discussion 3 02-06-2006 07:06 PM
creatine monohydrate cathal Dieting / Supplement Discussion 6 10-05-2005 04:04 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin Version {1. Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2008 Sherdog.com | Privacy Policy | Click here to advertise on Sherdog