Quote:
|
Originally Posted by InSummary
"its a hypothesis to be tested - thats a big difference from a conclusion" - Jones
Steve Jones is just doing this for publicity. he's obviously aware there is not enough evidence to prove this theory, and more importantly, he knows full well this theory cannot be properly "tested" - considering the circumstances.
the "crutch" of his argument is wtc 7 - which by ALL accounts, was massively damaged on its south face. unfortunately the south face of wtc 7 faced the towers, and thus, after their collapse, was not capable of being captured on camara due to the smoke etc. there is one good picture of the southwest corner of wtc 7 which shows an 18 story chunk missing from the building caused by the towers collapsing into it.
these CT's are nonsense and most certainly stand to gain no further ground on the intellectual community. lay them to rest already.
|
It's called "crux", not "crutch you moran. I agree with your theory that wtc 7 was made of popsicle sticks and white glue. It was bound to collapse with such shoddy workmanship.