|
why dont we all be mature and realize that there is no best, there is just bad ass.
Dekkers was badass in a realm with more competition than the amount of people most of us know.
Hoost was pretty damn bad ass. He beat a lot of dudes who are as well bad ass, he also looked very good because K1 does this, they make you look bad ass by beating down on dudes maybe not bad ass enough for the right to face you but they do anyways. He got caught sometimes but not most of the time.
Kaman, pretty damn bad ass. People forget he aint huge and he has a different body type. Rob was a bad ass who was good for the weight he fought at. Hoost more easily fought heavier guys cause he is a lanky big dude. Kaman, though perfectly athletic and skilled, is not the same lanky tall bastard as Hoost Hoost was much smaller than the man you have seen of late when he fought Kaman.
I would say that Hoost and Kaman were pretty bad ass and ruled with a pretty damn iron fist. Dekkers has a myth around him that he was this ubeatable bad ass, no no. Dekkers was a total bad ass because he would never turn down a fight especially if the odds were shitty. Thats why the Thais love him and why he has such a rep. He has wooped a lot of dudes, but he has been wooped by way more dudes than have wooped Hoost and Kaman combined.
They are all bad ass dudes though in the end.
|