Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ThirdPartyView
So why didn't he pop up the old thread with Louis, Dempsey and Johnson on it if he had anything new to add? Doesn't exactly take much effort. Nonetheless, this alone isn't worth a ban (and maybe not even double yellows).
Kid McCoy disagrees that it was a logical opinion, and not simply selective bashing.
He bashed Jim Braddock excessively (at least 3 times, as I cited), and Max Baer twice. And, as I said, no where in the rule you keep on citing does it say that excessive fighter bashing (such as attacking Braddock relentlessly for a number of posts) isn't a ban worthy offense. It just sorts the individual bashings by level, but never. And I remember ShootoPanama (I think) stating to someone in a thread in the MMA forum that excessive fighter bashing, even if not extreme, can and will lead to a ban. So it's not just Tam-Tam's 'crazy idea', sorry to tell you.
Since I don't know anything about these cases, I'll let him argue with you about it. |
1.the new thread was not on louis,dempsey,and johnson,but soley to discuss louis
2.just because one member thinks there is no logic on his opinion,does not make it so.
me and other posters thought he did have a point.if compareing louis to ali and stating louis was knocked down by lesser oppenents and ali was not,that is a logical statement to support your side of the debate that ali was better.and thats what forums are for.
3.he should be warned for bashing,and that is what dubbs are for.but to ban a two year member with three thousand post for minor bashing making no personal or hateful attacks is wrong.