I'm not sure why you are nuthugging Time Warner so much. They have a track record of really shitty business practices. I doubt that HDNet are blameless in this instance but I am sure that HDNet need TimeWarner way more than Time Warner needs HDNet. If you are looking to point a finger at someone, the cable company is definately the culprit.
It's all academic to me. The cable provider where I live (Comcast) doesn't carry HDNet at all. I switched to DirecTV 100% because of HDNet and don't regret it a bit.
Cheers!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boylehatesu
Anyone who has Time Warner and HD has noticed more and more hd channels being added for free, they also upgrade you for free from digital cable to hd. Dish/Direct tv do not. You pay more for hd programing.
So if you attempted to get all us MMA fans blindly hating Time Warner because you didnt get the price you asked for HDNet from Time Warner. You are mistaken.
What was the price you asked for your "package" per subscriber. I am very interested.
|