[speakhandsforme]

I've always enjoyed Tanner as a fighter and I do not deny the fact that he comes off as an amiable figure in the sport, but, in reference to Rogan comments concerning Tanner's self-recognition as a "philosopher" and rugged intellectual, something is getting lost in translation: his writing and narrow-scoped perspectives are just awful. Well, not awful: just numbingly generic and void of real grammatical merit.

Agree? Disagree? I thought this might be a nice change-of-pace thread.