Quote:
Originally Posted by Piper
Well Mr. Brilliant, show us the proof of genetics as the cause of homosexuality. Then tell us - who actually are rational - how homosexual acts are not disordered and are the equivalent of natural heterosexual acts. Should a woman be able to declare a vibrator as a dependent? or a pet? Where does the irrrationality end?
Those of us that are rational on the matter, and it is still the majority come referendum time, are still calling the Emperor naked - no matter how finely he tries to dress up, he is irrational. We can see how nakedly ridiculous this looks.
Homosexual coupling is NOT marriage. If a 4-3 decision by the CA court was that the earth was flat, that wouldn't make it so. That they say gay "marriage" is marriage doesn't make it so. Those of us that are rational can see that.
As I said in my first posts, the US Supreme court will eventually have to deal with the issue and fortunately they are more rational than then 4-3 decsion coming out of California. Then, too, one or two on the CA supreme court might die or retire, and the thing can swing back.
They had a man on TV here in San Diego commenting on the decision. He is gay, and he is against gay marriage. He says, rationally and legally, it just isn't marriage and the 4 court judges were wrong.
|
Who gives a shit if it's genetics or if it's a choice.
Marriage should be a choice for whoever wants to go through with it as well.
You're right though. It's not the right for judges to decide marriage...straight or gay.
Marriage should be left private. That's it.