|
I don't agree with his scoring on the second fight at all. How is the first round a 10-8 when Cale still is landing some shots standing, even though he's losing, and scores two takedowns and lands several shots after both? Also how is Schultz considered to do better in the second compared to Cale in the first when Schultz has nothing of interest whatsoever in the round? If he gave both rounds 10-9 I'd be ok but giving the first 10-8 in itself, and even more when he gives the second 10-9, he comes across as very biased.
The evaluation of the first fight is surprisingly unbiased given what he said about the second. I agree with him here but saying that this fight was stopped a bit to early is more realistic than giving Schultz 10-8 in the first of his fight.
|