Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerome_1
The argument isn't how people behaved but whether they believe how they behave is right or wrong. You don't have a study of ancient Roman Emperors, or people who molest children in remote tribes evaluating whether they thought their actions were right or wrong. So your point is moot.
My argument is that people have an innate sense of morality, and they know, or can sense that certain things they do are wrong.
|
What the hell are you talking about? If the majority doesn't determine correct and normal acceptable behavior, or "morally correct" behavior, then who does? Morality changes based on external conditions, nothing inherent to it. If the majority is committing improper behavior and recognize this, they change their standard of what is morally acceptable. How freakin hard is that to understand?