Quote:
Originally Posted by niloroth
Okay, so you are saying that Miller is a credible witness then? So then all these quotes are what?
“Somerset County Coroner Wallace Miller said the remains are expected to be so minute that radiology and DNA testing may be the only means of positively identifying the victims.” - Associated Press (September 12, 2001)
“We’ve been going through this area inch by inch. The remains are beginning to come,” said Somerset County coroner Wallace Miller. “It will be quite some time until we can identify whoever a person might be.” - Associated Press (September 13, 2001)
“Dennis Dirkmaat, a forensic pathologist from Mercyhurst College in Erie, Pa., said the remains had suffered “extreme fragmentation” and most would have to be identified through DNA analysis. He said experts also would use dental records, X-rays, and fingerprints and footprints.” - Washington Post (September 14, 2001)
“It would be nearly an hour before Miller came upon his first trace of a body part…some fragment of each of the dead had been positively identified, either by DNA or, in a few cases, fingerprints.” - Washington Post (May 12, 2002)
|
Only witnesses that say things that lean towards the conspiracy theorist beliefs are valid, all other witness were hired by the government to provide false statements, In the case where the same person is used, all other testimony that disproves the conspiracy must be over looked, and the subject must be changed and another source must be looked at instead of addressing these obvious contradictions.
The funny part is most of the sources these conspiracy theorists use don't even support the facts they claim, I have even seen video's that they have posted that actually disprove their whole shitty conspiracy, and these tards use it as the whole basis of their argument.