[DrSatanDracula]

Darwinist:

Thanks for the lengthy p ost.

I ask you this: How is this to be held as objectionable when any political movement will seek the concrete manifestation of its aims? The Republican and Democratic parties stated goals are the take over of the government under their principles. Conservative and Labour policy in the UK is the same. Scientology has a political movement that comes from its principles. How is this objectionable?

I would also make the embarrassing point that the relation of anti-Scientologists to Radical Atheist discredits many anti-Scientologist positions. The vitriol against religious groups expressed in Radical Atheist literature is virtually indistinguishable from Hubbard's anti-anti-Scientologist points here. Of course, one can be an anti-scientologist and not part of Radical Atheism. One might adopt a Christian perspective, whose goals have always been the take over of government, too...